Summary: | udev permissions for /dev/sr* not set correct when rule is in 10-local.rules | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | feind |
Component: | [OLD] Core system | Assignee: | Greg Kroah-Hartman (RETIRED) <gregkh> |
Status: | VERIFIED NEEDINFO | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | x86 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
feind
2005-06-26 05:37:33 UTC
(In reply to comment #0) > if i make a symlink 90-local.rules -> 10-local.rules it will > work again (and is inconsistent with the udev manual). No such files are installed with udev-056, delete them or fix them. Also, don't use SCSI emulation for CDRW drives with 2.6.x kernels. (In reply to comment #1) > No such files are installed with udev-056, delete them or fix them. Also, don't > use SCSI emulation for CDRW drives with 2.6.x kernels. they are not installed with udev-056, i use them to override 50-udev.rules since the udev default sets /dev/sr*'s group to disk and not to cdrw or cdrom which they should be. 10-local.rules should, as the man pages state, override the 50-udev.rules since they are supposed to be read before the installed one. and as i said in my first post, it works when my local rules file is called 90-*, but not when its called 10-* (which is inconsistent with the man page, if im able to read..). this also means that the rule *is* correct and must not be changed and either the manpage or udev has to be corrected. also there is no need for me not to use ide-scsi, but this is off topic anyway.. Why not offer up a fix for the cdsymlinks.sh program for the proper group? cdsymlinks.sh is now gone. This is not an issue anymore. |