Summary: | Version bump (0.8.9) and keyword addition (~x86) requests for media-plugins/gst-plugins-swfdec | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Peter Gordon (RETIRED) <codergeek42> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | GStreamer package maintainers <gstreamer> |
Status: | RESOLVED LATER | ||
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | x86 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Peter Gordon (RETIRED)
![]() i'm not happy with swfdec's quality yet to support it as a gst plugin What do you mean exactly? It has yet to crash Epiphany and seems to work well enough with some sites (Homestar Runner, for example). For things it doesn't support, it merely display a blank white image, but can usually still play the audio. Now, granted, it can't play all flash files very well but, like gplflash (which was very unstable for me), it's based on trying to reverse-engineer the flash format, which is proprietary (similar to the fact that many F/OSS word processors can open MS Word documents, albeit not very well usually). This is much more stable for me than gplflash (which *is* supported and in Portage). Not to be rude, but if the devs didn't like its quality enough to support it, could they simply put it in the tree and package.mask (as it is now) it so that those like me who want to use it can use it without worrying about installing it through an overlay or similar? The overlay ability is there for exactly the reason you have said. Adding gst-plugin-blah ebuilds is very very easy to do. This is encouraged for plugins that are not first class plugins (like vorbis, ogg, etc.) swfdec is not there yet (i hear its much improved in cvs so will try once david releases a new version) and maybe if it works better i will add it to portage. Yes, I do want a swfdec plugin in portage. That is why I took over swfdec itself's maintainership. But until it works much better than now, I am not going to add it. Ah. I think I understand. Thanks for the explanation. :-) Should I mark this as RESOLVED/LATER then? yah it should be marked resolved later |