Summary: | dev-java/open-test-reporting-events-0.2.0_pre1: unsupported MAVEN_PROVIDES format | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Fabio Rossi <rossi.f> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Java team <java> |
Status: | CONFIRMED --- | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | gentoo, rossi.f |
Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | PullRequest |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
See Also: | https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/40913 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Fabio Rossi
2025-03-05 10:09:23 UTC
Have you tried with java-ebuilder-9999? If that one works, please reassign this bug there asking for a new release. I gave up using java-ebuilder some time ago, so cannot tell. Yes, using 9999 Parsing portage tree @ /usr/portage ... Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 1 out of bounds for length 1 at org.gentoo.java.ebuilder.portage.PortageParser.parseEbuild(PortageParser.java:401) at org.gentoo.java.ebuilder.portage.PortageParser.parsePackage(PortageParser.java:422) at org.gentoo.java.ebuilder.portage.PortageParser.parseCategory(PortageParser.java:240) at org.gentoo.java.ebuilder.portage.PortageParser.parseCategories(PortageParser.java:225) at org.gentoo.java.ebuilder.portage.PortageParser.parseTree(PortageParser.java:145) at org.gentoo.java.ebuilder.Main.refreshCache(Main.java:380) at org.gentoo.java.ebuilder.Main.main(Main.java:48) make: *** [cache.mk:5: /var/lib/java-ebuilder/cache/pre-stage1-cache.raw] Error 1 BTW open-test-reporting-events-0.2.0_pre1 is the only one using array format for MAVEN_PROVIDES. All the other packages are using multiline string format, e.g. dev-java/ant-1.10.15. (In reply to Fabio Rossi from comment #2) > Yes, using 9999 > [...] > BTW open-test-reporting-events-0.2.0_pre1 is the only one using array format > for MAVEN_PROVIDES. All the other packages are using multiline string > format, e.g. dev-java/ant-1.10.15. Ah, good you found the reason. Will you please provide a pull request adjusting it, possibly combined with vbump to final 0.2.0? BTW: For bumping to latest JUnit5 we'd need to package the other modules as well which would need immutables/immutables packaged. |