Summary: | unace 2.2 binary ebuild | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Christoph Gysin <christoph.gysin> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Linux bug wranglers <bug-wranglers> |
Status: | VERIFIED DUPLICATE | ||
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | x86 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://www.winace.com/ | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: | app-arch/unace-bin/unace-bin-2.20.ebuild |
Description
Christoph Gysin
2005-06-04 11:17:11 UTC
Created attachment 60599 [details]
app-arch/unace-bin/unace-bin-2.20.ebuild
ebuild for unace-2.2
please search... *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 84370 *** *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 84370 *** Actually i *did* search. The problem is that #84370 is RESOLVED FIXED and didn't show up in the search window. This doesn't seems correct to me. The title of bug #84370 is "new version of unace that extracts archives that can't be extracted by current version in portage", which isn't FIXED (more like RESOLVED WONTFIX). I'm still unable to extract unace v2 archives. Is it possible to add unace-bin-2.2 hard-masked with a post-intstall warning, so that I *do* have the choice to emerge it from portage? If not, please reopen #84370 so I can follow it until it really is resolved, e.g. I'm able to extract unace v2 from portage. Thanks Please, read the comments in that bug. It won Please, read the comments in that bug. It won´t be in portage b/c it is broken like hell security-wise (Bug 81958). Period. Post to Bug 84370 if upstream ever releases a fixed version. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 84370 *** CLOSED. |