| Summary: | x11-libs/libXcursor-1.2.3: stablereq | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Matt Turner <mattst88> |
| Component: | Stabilization | Assignee: | Gentoo X packagers <x11> |
| Status: | IN_PROGRESS --- | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | CC: | hppa, newchief |
| Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | CC-ARCHES |
| Version: | unspecified | Flags: | nattka:
sanity-check+
|
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: |
=x11-libs/libXcursor-1.2.3
|
Runtime testing required: | --- |
|
Description
Matt Turner
2024-12-08 16:25:00 UTC
arm done sparc done arm64 done x86 done ppc done amd64 done Does this package affect handling of the Insert/Home/PageUp/Delete/End/PageDown keys? After yesterday's update those keys have stopped to work in Putty (which is linked against libXcursor, among other things). (In reply to Paul Osmialowski from comment #7) > Does this package affect handling of the > Insert/Home/PageUp/Delete/End/PageDown keys? After yesterday's update those > keys have stopped to work in Putty (which is linked against libXcursor, > among other things). I don't think so. (In reply to Matt Turner from comment #8) > (In reply to Paul Osmialowski from comment #7) > > Does this package affect handling of the > > Insert/Home/PageUp/Delete/End/PageDown keys? After yesterday's update those > > keys have stopped to work in Putty (which is linked against libXcursor, > > among other things). > > I don't think so. You were right. There was a bug report about it, although not in Gentoo: https://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=160926 and indeed,rebuilding putty with -O0 solves the problem. ppc64 done |
