| Summary: | sword-modules - incorrect digest | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Aarcane <aarcane> |
| Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | No maintainer - Look at https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proxy_Maintainers if you want to take care of it <maintainer-needed> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | blocker | CC: | gentoo-bugs, gent_bz, squinky86, telefrancisco, vanquirius |
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Other | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: |
digest-sword-modules-20040503
digest-sword-modules-20041209 |
||
|
Description
Aarcane
2005-05-24 01:06:56 UTC
Download works, the digest seems incorrect... wget http://www.crosswire.org/ftpmirror/pub/sword/packages/rawzip/KJVD.zip --14:21:35-- http://www.crosswire.org/ftpmirror/pub/sword/packages/rawzip/KJVD.zip => `KJVD.zip' Resolving www.crosswire.org... 64.140.154.250 Connecting to www.crosswire.org[64.140.154.250]:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 102,875 [application/zip] 100%[=================================================================================================>] 102,875 118.95K/s 14:21:36 (118.63 KB/s) - `KJVD.zip' saved [102,875/102,875] I can confirm this. ===== downstairs kjv # emerge sword-modules Calculating dependencies ...done! >>> emerge (1 of 1) app-text/sword-modules-20040503 to / >>> Downloading http://www.crosswire.org/ftpmirror/pub/sword/packages/rawzip/KJVD.zip --20:13:30-- http://www.crosswire.org/ftpmirror/pub/sword/packages/rawzip/KJVD.zip => `/usr/portage/distfiles/KJVD.zip' Resolving www.crosswire.org... 64.140.154.250 Connecting to www.crosswire.org[64.140.154.250]:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 102,875 [application/zip] 100%[======================================================================================>] 102,875 51.34K/s 20:13:33 (51.23 KB/s) - `/usr/portage/distfiles/KJVD.zip' saved [102,875/102,875] !!! Couldn't download KJVD.zip. Aborting. ===== The downloaded file is 102875 bytes large, although the digest seems to expect a file 102883 bytes large. I'm not sure what's changed, but I'd guess it's just a case of rebuilding the digest. I couldn't wait for the bug to be fixed, so I copied sword-modules to my overlay and updated the digest myself. It seems to all work fine. I'll attach the new digest file after this comment. Created attachment 61202 [details]
digest-sword-modules-20040503
New digest file calculated on my computer.
Created attachment 63441 [details]
digest-sword-modules-20041209
Same here with 20041209, so I add them here.
By the way, isn't the bug #86337 same as this? That bug should be made dupplied of this, as it contains less information that this, please :) Does someone actually maintain this? *** Bug 86337 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** I think squinky does, but he has been away for quite a long while. I suppose he
won't mind if we fix this...
In the meanwhile, I believe files hosted on our mirrors (see offensive USE flag)
were purged for some reason.
1) Does anybody have {BoM,Jasher,Quran}.zip?
2) Does anybody mind if I simply take them out from src_uri?
(In reply to comment #9) > 1) Does anybody have {BoM,Jasher,Quran}.zip? I've got them installed. (But I usually do not use them). > 2) Does anybody mind if I simply take them out from src_uri? I would not mind for them, but... Arab users may like Quran.zip (it's written in arab language). Mormon users would like Bom.zip and some Hebrews may like Jasher.zip, so, I think If no users reply to this, they could be deleted. Well, for the time being, I took everything related to the offensive USE flag out and redigested the ebuilds so that at least we have it working again. The 3 zip files I mentioned were probably purged from our mirrors for a reason and I should probably find out why first before uploading them again. If there is no demand, I think it is ok to just leave them out for now. Can anyone check if the new digest works now? (In reply to comment #9) > I think squinky does, but he has been away for quite a long while. I suppose he > won't mind if we fix this... Seems unlikely, wrt Bug 45935. If you are interested in this one and related ebuilds, then there are a few bugs that I have re-assigned to maintainer-needed or maintainer-wanted. ;) Marking as fixed. |
