| Summary: | net-p2p/biglybt-3.6.0.0: Loading SWT Libraries failed - no swt-cairo-gtk-4962r3 in java.library.path | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Anthony Brown <fspkwon> |
| Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Java team <java> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | trivial | CC: | flow, fspkwon, gentoo-setan, gentoo |
| Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | PullRequest |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | AMD64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| See Also: | https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/38143 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: | cairo patch | ||
|
Description
Anthony Brown
2024-07-24 23:13:55 UTC
What Gentoo package are you attempting to file a bug for? We need a build.log and emerge --info from that. it should have dev-java/swt:4.27[cairo] in CP_DEPEND Created attachment 898290 [details, diff]
cairo patch
Please try rebuiding with this and see if this works
rebuilding with this patch* It simply adds cairo use flag to the CP_DEPEND, as Pogadzki suggested. i will know within the next 24 hours im currently building qtcreator and waiting for a hardware module test : ) my sound driver... Ill set up a local ebuild host and try it thataway :) (In reply to gentoo-setan from comment #3) > Created attachment 898290 [details, diff] [details, diff] > cairo patch > > Please try rebuiding with this and see if this works Is this patch meant to be applied by a dev or will you create a PR? > Is this patch meant to be applied by a dev or will you create a PR?
I assume this patch works and that's why you are asking.
Assuming that you ask if this should be merged by a dev or with my PR,
I will make a PR for it.
The important thing is: does it fix the issue?
(In reply to gentoo-setan from comment #7) > > Is this patch meant to be applied by a dev or will you create a PR? > > I assume this patch works and that's why you are asking. > Assuming that you ask if this should be merged by a dev or with my PR, > I will make a PR for it. > > The important thing is: does it fix the issue? Why not test it yourself. Can you reproduce the issue before the change and can you reproduce it after? i assume that means its portages problem per-ebuild is it saying build this this way and while if you go up the tree such as swt-cairo cairo-gtk it says Specifically FOR biglybt is it not linking swt-cairo cairo-gtk?: because it HAS built the predecession like as asked what The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=7d3310cadc1d7cf74519643c677351f95abc6750 commit 7d3310cadc1d7cf74519643c677351f95abc6750 Author: Volkmar W. Pogatzki <gentoo@pogatzki.net> AuthorDate: 2024-08-14 08:28:01 +0000 Commit: Miroslav Šulc <fordfrog@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2024-08-14 08:53:23 +0000 net-p2p/biglybt: CP_DEPEND on swt:4.27[cairo] Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/936607 Signed-off-by: Volkmar W. Pogatzki <gentoo@pogatzki.net> Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/38143 Signed-off-by: Miroslav Šulc <fordfrog@gentoo.org> net-p2p/biglybt/{biglybt-3.6.0.0.ebuild => biglybt-3.6.0.0-r1.ebuild} | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) |
