Summary: | media-libs/libjxl-0.10.3 ppc keyword request | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Pacho Ramos <pacho> |
Component: | Keywording | Assignee: | Daniel Novomeský <dnovomesky> |
Status: | CONFIRMED --- | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | dnovomesky, mgorny, pacho, proxy-maint |
Priority: | Normal | Flags: | nattka:
sanity-check-
|
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: |
media-libs/libjxl-0.10.3 ppc
|
Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Pacho Ramos
2024-07-18 08:30:20 UTC
Umm, it seems it was intentionally dekeyworded (even if probably "-ppc" would be better if it is not supposed to work) https://bugs.gentoo.org/927307#c6 Unable to check for sanity:
> no match for package: >=x11-themes/gnome-backgrounds-46.0
ppc64 looks to also be affected... I think because of the mask at features/big-endian/package.mask, even if libjxl looks to be keyworded for it (In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #3) > ppc64 looks to also be affected... I think because of the mask at > features/big-endian/package.mask, even if libjxl looks to be keyworded for it Because of that, also sparc and hppa (both present at media-libs/libjxl KEYWORDS) are also not able to use it At least on Debian, they opted for skipping buggy tests instead of dropping the package at those arches: https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl/issues/2433 https://salsa.debian.org/debian-phototools-team/libjxl/-/blob/master/debian/patches/bigendian.patch?ref_type=heads https://salsa.debian.org/debian-phototools-team/libjxl/-/blob/master/debian/changelog?ref_type=heads#L14 All sanity-check issues have been resolved Can you try install and run the tests on pcc so we can see if the big endian problem persists also in media-libs/libjxl-0.10.3 ? I want to know if it was resolved meanwhile or we have to remind the libjxl developers to focus on finding solution. I cannot test on ppc, but looking at Debian package, it seems they are still hitting the problem. They even sent this bug during the past month: https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl/issues/3629 In https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl/issues/3629 they complained about 0.9.2 That's why I'd like that someone checks it with 0.10.3 Maybe you can try to CC the arch teams, they should be able to test and run the tests The tests are still failing in libjxl 0.10.3 https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl/issues/3629#issuecomment-2252426478 Unable to check for sanity:
> package masked: media-libs/libjxl-0.10.3, in all profiles for arch: ppc
|