| Summary: | hypermail-2.1.8 (New Package) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Christoph Bussenius <spam> |
| Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Linux bug wranglers <bug-wranglers> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | CC: | carlo, spam |
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Other | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: |
hypermail-2.1.8.ebuild
Patch: files/destdir.patch hypermail-2.1.8.ebuild -- removed two files from the "dodoc" line |
||
|
Description
Christoph Bussenius
2005-05-21 15:12:53 UTC
Created attachment 59487 [details, diff]
hypermail-2.1.8.ebuild
New ebuild for hypermail.
Created attachment 59489 [details]
Patch: files/destdir.patch
This patches Makefile.in so that make install DESTDIR=xxx works.
Created attachment 59495 [details, diff]
hypermail-2.1.8.ebuild -- removed two files from the "dodoc" line
(In reply to comment #0) > I'dd suggest net-mail for adding this ebuild. I have tested it on my amd600+ with Linux 2.6.13 This should be Linux 2.6.7-gentoo-r13 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 88428 *** Christoph, we don't need multiple request for the same application. Just attach your ebuild to bug 88428 and comment why you think it's better than the other one. And please search for existing requests before filing one. Carsten, thank you for your reply. > Just attach your ebuild to bug 88428 and comment why you think it's > better than the other one. What other one do you mean? As far as I see, the difference between bug #93482 (by me) and bug #88428 is that I actually supply an ebuild, wheareas the older bug report was just a request to make an ebuild. Marcello Magaldi writes that he can't compile hypermail because there is no ebuild yet, he does not include an ebuild. > And please search for existing requests before filing one. I did search bugzilla before, and I included a reference to the other bug in my comment. However I chose not to reply to the existing bug because its subject did not sound as if it contains an ebuild. I'll attach my ebuild to bug #88428 as you suggested. > What other one do you mean?
Oh, I did not look into the bug. It was file before this one, so this is the
dupe. Dead simple ;)
|