Summary: | dev-qt/qtwebengine-5.15.13_p20240322: Missing ppc64 patches | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Marcus Comstedt <marcus> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Qt Bug Alias <qt> |
Status: | RESOLVED PKGREMOVED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | marcus, nbowler, ppc64, sam, wrkemp |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | PPC64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
See Also: | https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=924936 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
A fixed ebuild for qtwebengine-5.15.13_p20240322 with the ppc64 fixed put back
Fix for bug 924936 |
Description
Marcus Comstedt
2024-05-08 15:52:25 UTC
Created attachment 892498 [details]
A fixed ebuild for qtwebengine-5.15.13_p20240322 with the ppc64 fixed put back
It was dropped because of bug 924936 where nobody was maintaining them. If you're willing to step up, we can reconsider... > bug 924936
Ah. I have a fix for that in my personal patchset.
I could step up if you want; I'd supply patches for big endian as well in that case.
Created attachment 892499 [details, diff] Fix for bug 924936 A new datapoint: dev-qt/qtwebengine-5.15.16_p20241115 builds and runs perfectly on ppc64 (big endian) with _exactly_ the same patchset that I have been using since qtwebengine-5.15.12_p20240122. So practically zero maintenance burden. The only thing I had to do (in addition to carrying _all_ the ppc64 patches instead of just the big endian ones in /etc/portage/patches) was to put the "# we need to generate ppc64 stuff because upstream does not ship it yet" block back in qtwebengine-5.15.16_p20241115.ebuild. |