Summary: | dev-python/qscintilla-python-2.14.1-r2: stablereq | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Michał Górny <mgorny> |
Component: | Stabilization | Assignee: | Python Gentoo Team <python> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | chiitoo, espinafre |
Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | CC-ARCHES |
Version: | unspecified | Flags: | nattka:
sanity-check+
|
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: |
=dev-python/qscintilla-python-2.14.1-r2 amd64 x86
=x11-libs/qscintilla-2.14.1-r1
|
Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Michał Górny
2024-05-01 13:23:39 UTC
Sanity check failed:
> dev-python/qscintilla-python-2.14.1-r2
> depend amd64 dev profile default/linux/amd64/17.0/musl (6 total)
> ~x11-libs/qscintilla-2.14.1:=[qt5(+),qt6(-)]
> depend amd64 stable profile default/linux/amd64/17.1 (45 total)
> ~x11-libs/qscintilla-2.14.1:=[qt5(+),qt6(-)]
> rdepend amd64 dev profile default/linux/amd64/17.0/musl (6 total)
> ~x11-libs/qscintilla-2.14.1:=[qt5(+),qt6(-)]
> rdepend amd64 stable profile default/linux/amd64/17.1 (45 total)
> ~x11-libs/qscintilla-2.14.1:=[qt5(+),qt6(-)]
@qt, is -r1 of qscintilla ready to go stable as well, or is the flag change part of something bigger? All sanity-check issues have been resolved (In reply to Michał Górny from comment #2) > @qt, is -r1 of qscintilla ready to go stable as well, or is the flag change > part of something bigger? Not a part of anything bigger as far as I know, so possibly ready since we haven't seen any issues pop up either (as far as I know). The change was done via a contribution of users in general, and we (the current qt-project) don't really know this package too well outside of testing the changes. As such, we'll be dropping it, with a bunch of others, to maintainer-needed soon. [1] Adding the contributor of the specific change to Cc. 1. https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/36508 arm64 done ppc done amd64 done x86 done arm done all arches done |