| Summary: | sys-libs/libseccomp-2.5.5-r1 fails tests: FAIL: regression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Agostino Sarubbo <ago> |
| Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Gentoo's Team for Core System packages <base-system> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | Keywords: | PATCH, PullRequest, TESTFAILURE |
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| See Also: |
https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/36273 https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp/pull/425 https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp/pull/433 |
||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Bug Depends on: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 915000 | ||
| Attachments: | build.log | ||
|
Description
Agostino Sarubbo
2024-03-10 08:09:42 UTC
Created attachment 887229 [details]
build.log
build log and emerge --info
Error(s) that match a know pattern in addition to what has been reported in the summary: FAIL: regression grep: ../include/seccomp-syscalls.h: No such file or directory tail: cannot open './syscalls.csv' for reading: No such file or directory The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=d58730757b79ce429d5fbe8f35dede6074d4c243 commit d58730757b79ce429d5fbe8f35dede6074d4c243 Author: Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2024-04-13 17:05:00 +0000 Commit: Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2024-04-13 17:10:47 +0000 sys-libs/libseccomp: backport fix for arch-syscall-check Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/926648 Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org> .../libseccomp-2.5.5-arch-syscall-check.patch | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++ sys-libs/libseccomp/libseccomp-2.5.5-r1.ebuild | 1 + 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+) I am unable to reproduce the "regression" test failure. I suspect it is caused by something specific to the tinderbox environment. Does the tinderbox run with its own set of seccomp filters? This might be implemented by a container manager or something like that. there are no filters here. However I reproduced the issue only with clang+lld The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=a65ce7b0b71668fb49b960d7259b36eba6ab34cc commit a65ce7b0b71668fb49b960d7259b36eba6ab34cc Author: Matoro Mahri <matoro_gentoo@matoro.tk> AuthorDate: 2024-04-15 23:04:59 +0000 Commit: WANG Xuerui <xen0n@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2024-04-17 19:45:21 +0000 sys-libs/libseccomp: rebase experimental-loong patches The fix backported in d58730757b79ce429d5fbe8f35dede6074d4c243 was already in the loong tree which makes the patch fail to apply. Rebase this and also now rather than having a huge patch that doesn't correspond to VCS with a bunch of checked-in autotools stuff, use the github diff and eautoreconf for 9999 and loong. Fixes: d58730757b79 ("sys-libs/libseccomp: backport fix for arch-syscall-check") Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/926648 Signed-off-by: Matoro Mahri <matoro_gentoo@matoro.tk> Signed-off-by: WANG Xuerui <xen0n@gentoo.org> sys-libs/libseccomp/Manifest | 1 + sys-libs/libseccomp/libseccomp-2.5.5-r1.ebuild | 18 +++++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (In reply to Agostino Sarubbo from comment #5) > there are no filters here. However I reproduced the issue only with clang+lld It's an aliasing bug. The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=00b81b84504c9de0c8bc7c9c9071afaf80cc6042 commit 00b81b84504c9de0c8bc7c9c9071afaf80cc6042 Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2024-10-06 14:59:25 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2024-10-07 02:39:24 +0000 sys-libs/libseccomp: backport aliasing fix I thought I'd backported this already, sorry. Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/926648 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> .../files/libseccomp-2.5.5-aliasing.patch | 30 +++++ sys-libs/libseccomp/libseccomp-2.5.5-r2.ebuild | 127 +++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 157 insertions(+) |
