Bug 923155

Summary:	app-office/libreoffice-7.6.4.1, app-crypt/gpgme-1.23.2, app-text/libexttextcat-3.4.7, app-text/poppler-24.02.0, dev-libs/icu-74.2 and dev-libs/boost-1.84.0-r3 stabilisation
Product:	Gentoo Linux	Reporter:	Andreas Sturmlechner <asturm>
Component:	Stabilization	Assignee:	Gentoo Office Team <office>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED
Severity:	normal	CC:	asturm, base-system, dilfridge, kde, printing, reavertm, soap
Priority:	Normal	Keywords:	CC-ARCHES, SECURITY
Version:	unspecified	Flags:	nattka: sanity-check+
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
See Also:	https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=918861 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=921609 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=917634
Whiteboard:
Package list:	app-office/libreoffice-7.6.4.1 amd64 arm64 ppc64 x86 app-office/libreoffice-bin-7.6.4.1 amd64 x86 app-office/libreoffice-bin-debug-7.6.4.1 amd64 x86 app-office/libreoffice-l10n-7.6.4.1 amd64 arm64 ppc64 x86 app-crypt/gpgme-1.23.2 app-text/libexttextcat-3.4.7 amd64 arm64 ppc ppc64 x86 app-text/poppler-24.02.0 dev-libs/icu-74.2 dev-libs/icu-layoutex-74.2 amd64 ppc ppc64 sparc x86 dev-libs/boost-1.84.0-r3 app-text/libetonyek-0.1.10-r2 amd64 arm64 ppc64 x86 dev-libs/liborcus-0.19.2 amd64 arm64 ppc64 x86 dev-libs/libixion-0.19.0 amd64 arm64 ppc64 x86 dev-util/mdds-2.1.1 amd64 arm64 ppc64 x86	Runtime testing required:	---
Bug Depends on:	923366, 924930
Bug Blocks:	918858, 919894, 923255

Description Andreas Sturmlechner gentoo-dev

2024-01-28 16:52:14 UTC

In preparation.

@boost maintainers: maybe this time!

Comment 1 Andreas Sturmlechner gentoo-dev

2024-01-31 00:14:39 UTC

Remaining boost-1.84 blocker isn't even stable and already broken by GCC-13, so no longer a hindrance here.

Comment 2 Andreas K. Hüttel archtester

2024-02-07 21:24:16 UTC

[22:23:06] <gentoovcs> dilfridge → repo/gentoo (app-office/libreoffice-bin/) app-office/libreoffice-bin: add 7.6.4.1
[22:23:06] <gentoovcs> dilfridge → repo/gentoo (app-office/libreoffice-bin-debug/) app-office/libreoffice-bin-debug: add 7.6.4.1

Comment 3 Sam James archtester

2024-02-11 03:46:04 UTC

Any reason to not go ahead now, especially given boost somehow got stabled on one arch already (sparc)?

Comment 4 Andreas Sturmlechner gentoo-dev

2024-02-11 07:31:47 UTC

Only the time these packages have(n't) had in ~arch yet. I don't think what sparc does is of big concern.

Comment 5 Andreas Sturmlechner gentoo-dev

2024-02-12 09:49:35 UTC

[10:48] <soap> asturm: doit

mkay then

Comment 6 Sam James archtester

2024-02-12 10:30:32 UTC

amd64 done

Comment 7 Arthur Zamarin archtester

2024-02-17 09:55:17 UTC

ppc64 done

Comment 8 Sam James archtester

2024-02-20 05:55:15 UTC

arm done

Comment 9 Sam James archtester

2024-02-20 05:55:16 UTC

arm64 done

Comment 10 Sam James archtester

2024-02-20 05:55:18 UTC

hppa done

Comment 11 Sam James archtester

2024-02-20 05:55:19 UTC

ppc done

Comment 12 Sam James archtester

2024-02-20 05:55:20 UTC

sparc done

Comment 13 Sam James archtester

2024-02-20 05:55:22 UTC

x86 done

all arches done