Summary: | sys-apps/portage - warn when multilib profile is selected with CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION=n | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Portage Development | Reporter: | genBTC |
Component: | Core - Interface (emerge) | Assignee: | Portage team <dev-portage> |
Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | ||
Severity: | minor | CC: | ago |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
See Also: |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736152 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=934391 |
||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
libatomic X86 build failure
the glibc unpack has an IA32 check - other packages do not |
Description
genBTC
2023-12-17 19:20:36 UTC
Created attachment 879745 [details]
libatomic X86 build failure
Created attachment 879746 [details]
the glibc unpack has an IA32 check - other packages do not
This really isn't a "profiles" issue. Profiles are simply configuration; they don't directly cause any messaging to be displayed to the user. It sounds like you are proposing an enhancement to the Portage package manager (emerge). My opinion: this is too much hand holding. If you choose to disable CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION, you should be fully aware of what you are doing. Agreed - this is PEBKAC, sorry. Don't set things you don't understand or don't understand the consequences of. Supposing there were an appropriate place to do this - like pkg_pretend in every multilib pkg, that'd slow things down so much, just to avoid a footgun in a niche situation. I'll call this WONTFIX given it seems I'm not alone on this. If another developer on the team wants to revisit it, we can. *** Bug 941610 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |