Summary: | app-emacs/pinentry-0.1_p20170913 keyword request | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Ulrich Müller <ulm> |
Component: | Keywording | Assignee: | GNU Emacs project <gnu-emacs> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | base-system, matoro_gentoo |
Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | CC-ARCHES, KEYWORDREQ |
Version: | unspecified | Flags: | nattka:
sanity-check+
|
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: |
app-emacs/pinentry-0.1_p20170913 alpha ia64 mips ppc ppc64 riscv amd64-linux x86-linux ppc-macos x64-macos
app-crypt/pinentry-1.2.1-r4 ia64 ppc ppc64 riscv
|
Runtime testing required: | --- |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 873523 |
Description
Ulrich Müller
2023-11-17 13:10:24 UTC
hppa done arm64 done sparc done arm done Test plan: <https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Emacs/Test_plans#app-emacs.2Fpinentry> Sorry for providing this late. (In reply to Jakov Smolić)
> Runtime testing required: --- → Yes
WFM, but since this is purely Emacs Lisp and allarches, maybe one arch team could test and report back here?
(In reply to Ulrich Müller from comment #6) > (In reply to Jakov Smolić) > > Runtime testing required: --- → Yes > > WFM, but since this is purely Emacs Lisp and allarches, maybe one arch team > could test and report back here? Sure, I'll try to test it today (I've never used emacs though so if someone can do it more quickly feel free to :)) (In reply to Ulrich Müller from comment #5) > Test plan: > <https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Emacs/Test_plans#app-emacs.2Fpinentry> > > Sorry for providing this late. I've successfully executed the test procedure on amd64 I'll reset the flags since we should still compile-test app-crypt/pinentry on remaining arches riscv done alpha done ia64 done mips done ppc64 done ppc done all arches done |