Summary: | Genkernel modification wishlist | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Hosted Projects | Reporter: | Yanestra <Yanestra> |
Component: | genkernel | Assignee: | Gentoo Genkernel Maintainers <genkernel> |
Status: | UNCONFIRMED --- | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | reagentoo, timkenhan |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Yanestra
2023-11-12 18:54:50 UTC
While I actually agree quite a bit with your frustration, and it's why I think genkernel should either go away or receive a significant revamp, a rant does not make a good bug report and should ideally be about one actionable issue. But I suppose the output issue is quite related to the rat's nest of heuristics in that the output exists partly because of it. Really, genkernel needs a new maintainer and for someone to make some opinionated decisions (perhaps you!). Let me know why you build the kernel with genkernel instead of using dist-kernel. For example, I use it only for compiling initrd image: USE="-initramfs" emerge gentoo-kernel genkernel ramdisk |