| Summary: | flag-o-matic.eclass: Consider allowing ordinary alignment flags (-f{,no-}align-{functions,jumps,loops}) in strip-flags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | setun.90 |
| Component: | Eclasses | Assignee: | Gentoo Toolchain Maintainers <toolchain> |
| Status: | UNCONFIRMED --- | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | CC: | kocelfc |
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: | emerge --info output | ||
Created attachment 873766 [details]
emerge --info output
As discussed on IRC but ftr, I'm fine with this in principle, but I'm going to check gcc's bugzilla & also ask them on irc if there's any issues from the past they're aware of. Could "-malign-data" also possibly be added to the allowed flags? |
As the summary says. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Include any of -f{,no-}align-{functions,jumps,loops} in {C{,XX},F{,C}}FLAGS 2. Emerge any package with extensive flag filtering (e.g. sys-devel/gcc, sys-libs/glibc, sys-devel/binutils, etc.) 3. cat /var/db/pkg/${package_in_question}/{C{,XX},F{,C}}FLAGS Actual Results: Alignment flags are filtered. Expected Results: Alignment flags are present.