| Summary: | media-libs/mesa-9999 with USE="opencl" requires >=dev-util/meson-1.2.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Jason Oliveira <jason.oliveira> |
| Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Gentoo X packagers <x11> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| See Also: |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=913478 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=913622 |
||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
|
Description
Jason Oliveira
2023-08-29 02:46:32 UTC
> mesa chokes and dies when rusticl cries and whines.
Please try to be less obnoxious.
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=87eccb808788efd2959f0d7e9d4a84883098924b commit 87eccb808788efd2959f0d7e9d4a84883098924b Author: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2023-08-29 14:34:30 +0000 Commit: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2023-08-29 14:35:19 +0000 media-libs/mesa: Require >=meson-1.2.0 for USE=opencl Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/913178 Signed-off-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org> media-libs/mesa/mesa-9999.ebuild | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) (In reply to Matt Turner from comment #1) > > mesa chokes and dies when rusticl cries and whines. > > Please try to be less obnoxious. Interesting, I've never seen someone emotionally-attached to lines of compiled code that they didn't write. Next time, I'll include an ebuild so you have nothing to complain about. Thanks for making the one-liner fix. (In reply to Jason Oliveira from comment #3) > (In reply to Matt Turner from comment #1) > > > mesa chokes and dies when rusticl cries and whines. > > > > Please try to be less obnoxious. > > Interesting, I've never seen someone emotionally-attached to lines of > compiled code that they didn't write. > It's more about how we're used to skimming build.logs and emerge --info for issues and having to read through nonsensical "steps to reproduce" is a waste of time, but we have to read it given someone wrote it and there might be something important there. > Next time, I'll include an ebuild so you have nothing to complain about. > Thanks for making the one-liner fix. A unified diff would be nice but not really needed for this. |