Summary: | "emaint binhost -f" leaks host settings into Packages files | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Portage Development | Reporter: | Andreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge> |
Component: | Binary packages support | Assignee: | Portage team <dev-portage> |
Status: | CONFIRMED --- | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | flow, sam, syu.os |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
See Also: |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=640318 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=644990 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=924772 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=949628 |
||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Andreas K. Hüttel
![]() ![]() PS. I haven't actually seen any negative impact of this. Still... Making this block gentoo-binhost since we should maybe at least poke it a little bit... I'm not sure if this is intentional or not. I guess it's wrong because you're just regenerating it from the host, even though it got built natively on s390, rather than cross-built binpkgs. Zac? We should be able to drop anything not related to bug 640318 or bug 644990. Some miscellaneous things were exposed here: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=80df4d593c66a45d855c1986bae3328a866318c7 commit 80df4d593c66a45d855c1986bae3328a866318c7 Author: Zac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org> Date: 2007-06-01 01:50:06 +0000 Add some additional variables to the Packages header. svn path=/main/trunk/; revision=6705 |