Summary: | sys-apps/groff: /usr/X11R6 -> /usr move | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | TGL <tom.gl> |
Component: | [OLD] Core system | Assignee: | Gentoo's Team for Core System packages <base-system> |
Status: | RESOLVED LATER | ||
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | 90789 | ||
Bug Blocks: | |||
Attachments: | groff-1.19.1-r2--x11_prefix.patch |
Description
TGL
2005-05-01 10:41:00 UTC
Created attachment 57754 [details, diff]
groff-1.19.1-r2--x11_prefix.patch
fixed in portage err there is no x11-prefix eclass what's the point in filing bugs when the eclass isnt even in portage > what's the point in filing bugs when the eclass isnt even in portage
What would be the point of submitting that kind of eclass without reporting some use-cases? Sorry you've not seen the bug dependency, but seriously, that's not my bad.
whatever, re-open when the eclass is usuable ... i added a different fix for the xmkmf which doesnt require the eclass, but i have no idea what the fix_imake func does |