Summary: | app-office/gnucash-4.13: reports stopped to work after gentoo update | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Miroslav Šulc <fordfrog> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Aaron W. Swenson <titanofold> |
Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | Adrian.Bassett, sam |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
See Also: | https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=908563 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: | app-office/gnucash-4.13 -> app-office/gnucash-5.1 ebuild unified diff |
Description
Miroslav Šulc
![]() My guess is Mesa. Try downgrading to release first? (In reply to Sam James from comment #1) > My guess is Mesa. Try downgrading to release first? Can't comment on the specific suggestion re mesa (and I'm not using the outdated gnucash version in portage anyway) but can at least confirm that a local overlay install of gnucash-5.1 is fine with mesa-23.1.2, in case that helps. (In reply to Adrian Bassett from comment #2) > (In reply to Sam James from comment #1) > > My guess is Mesa. Try downgrading to release first? > > Can't comment on the specific suggestion re mesa (and I'm not using the > outdated gnucash version in portage anyway) but can at least confirm that a > local overlay install of gnucash-5.1 is fine with mesa-23.1.2, in case that > helps. Submit a PR to update gnucash in gentoo? (Or attach a git-amable patch to a bug). Created attachment 863868 [details, diff]
app-office/gnucash-4.13 -> app-office/gnucash-5.1 ebuild unified diff
(In reply to Adrian Bassett from comment #4) > Created attachment 863868 [details, diff] [details, diff] > app-office/gnucash-4.13 -> app-office/gnucash-5.1 ebuild unified diff I have tried this on previous occasions, most recently on 22nd April. cf. https://bugs.gentoo.org/904824 (assigned to the long-standing maintainer of gnucash), which requested a bump to the then new 4.14 (the last in the 4.x branch) and suggested some steps involved, relative to the then current 4.13. As indicated in that bug, report 5.0 had also been released at that point. This was superseded by 5.1 on 30th April - https://gnucash.org/news.phtml Attached is a patch for the 4.13 -> 5.1 ebuild upgrade. The filesdir will need to copy gnucash-4.13-webkit2gtk-4.1.patch to gnucash-5.1-webkit2gtk-4.1.patch. Also, the ${FILESDIR}/${PN}-4.13-no-werror.patch is now obsolete so isn't needed by 5.1. (In reply to Adrian Bassett from comment #4) > Created attachment 863868 [details, diff] [details, diff] > app-office/gnucash-4.13 -> app-office/gnucash-5.1 ebuild unified diff It's a lot easier for us to test & apply, especially if I'm not the maintainer but just want to help out, if there's a patch against gentoo.git rather than me having to manually assemble all the relevant changes. (In reply to Sam James from comment #6) > (In reply to Adrian Bassett from comment #4) > > Created attachment 863868 [details, diff] [details, diff] [details, diff] > > app-office/gnucash-4.13 -> app-office/gnucash-5.1 ebuild unified diff > > It's a lot easier for us to test & apply, especially if I'm not the > maintainer but just want to help out, if there's a patch against gentoo.git > rather than me having to manually assemble all the relevant changes. Yup, I understand that, but I'm not currently sure of how to go about patching against gentoo.git as my use of git wrt gentoo is basically a read-only involvement with a clone of the upstream portage tree. I'll see if I can educate myself... (In reply to Adrian Bassett from comment #7) > (In reply to Sam James from comment #6) > > (In reply to Adrian Bassett from comment #4) > > > Created attachment 863868 [details, diff] [details, diff] [details, diff] [details, diff] > > > app-office/gnucash-4.13 -> app-office/gnucash-5.1 ebuild unified diff > > > > It's a lot easier for us to test & apply, especially if I'm not the > > maintainer but just want to help out, if there's a patch against gentoo.git > > rather than me having to manually assemble all the relevant changes. > > Yup, I understand that, but I'm not currently sure of how to go about > patching against gentoo.git as my use of git wrt gentoo is basically a > read-only involvement with a clone of the upstream portage tree. I'll see > if I can educate myself... I mean that any changes I make locally are just in a files-based overlay it was probably really some of the live ebuilds, it's ok today. i created a separate bug for the bump and i'm closing this one as invalid. > I mean that any changes I make locally are just in a files-based overlay [...] Got it. Happy to try walk you through it if you get stuck. Might be easier to chat on IRC for something like that. I can obviously just do the bump now as a one-off but I don't use gnucash and I'd love to have another contributor if you're interested, so.. (In reply to Miroslav Šulc from comment #9) > it was probably really some of the live ebuilds, it's ok today. i created a > separate bug for the bump and i'm closing this one as invalid. Thanks for confirming it's ok now! |