| Summary: | app-admin/lnav: arm, arm64 keywording | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Sam James <sam> |
| Component: | Keywording | Assignee: | No maintainer - Look at https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proxy_Maintainers if you want to take care of it <maintainer-needed> |
| Status: | CONFIRMED --- | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | arm64, arm |
| Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | CC-ARCHES, PullRequest |
| Version: | unspecified | Flags: | nattka:
sanity-check+
|
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: |
app-admin/lnav ~arm ~arm64
|
Runtime testing required: | --- |
| Bug Depends on: | 905217 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Sam James
2023-04-25 12:56:17 UTC
I am unfamiliar with what the proper workflow might be for this, but I opened a PR in case that's the right path. I poked around in https://devmanual.gentoo.org/keywording/index.html and I didn't find content regarding how to add new keywords to packages. Let me know if I've missed it and if I did it incorrectly ☺ In particular it wasn't clear to me if I should send a PR, or if I simply needed to ACK on this bug. In case the latter, I'm happy to close the PR, and: ACK ☺ I learned from Sam in the PR that since I don't have an ARM Gentoo system to test with that I should not send a PR, so I am removing the PR from this issue. I don't have firsthand knowledge of whether lnav officially supports ARM for Linux, but I don't know of any reason they wouldn't, and I do see that they officially support ARM for MacOS: https://formulae.brew.sh/formula/lnav It sounds like I should leave this ticket for the arch teams to do, but let me know if any further action is requested from me. |