Summary: | x11-misc/slim-9999 - build failure - slim-9999/log.h:34:25: error: no match for ‘operator<<’ (operand types are ‘std::ostream’ {aka ‘std::basic_ostream<char>’} and ‘const PAM::Exception’) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Fab <netbox253> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Robert Pearce <bugs.gentoo> |
Status: | UNCONFIRMED --- | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | ceamac, futurehypoon, proxy-maint |
Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | PATCH |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | https://sourceforge.net/p/slim-fork/tickets/3/ | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
build log
fix build with PAM enabled |
Description
Fab
2023-04-15 11:17:53 UTC
Created attachment 860151 [details]
build log
Forgot to say that slim-1.4.0 builds fine, but have an issue with it with dual-monitor setup and nvidia-drivers, so I would like to try 9999 according to ¹. 1. https://sourceforge.net/p/slim-fork/tickets/3/ Created attachment 860155 [details] fix build with PAM enabled slim-9999 -r68 is building fine with the attached patch. This conditional include was removed in -r66 ¹. 1. https://sourceforge.net/p/slim-fork/code/66/ I went down the same path: four monitors, nvidia-drivers, issue with stuff rendering out-of-place, saw the discussion on sourceforge, tried to install the live ebuild, and it failed to compile. I'm not testing the patch though, due to a mostly-unrelated bad experience toying with the live ebuild earlier today. I'll wait patiently for the next stable ebuild. |