Bug 898150

Summary:	dev-ruby/rcairo-1.17.8: add ruby30 support
Product:	Gentoo Linux	Reporter:	Rafał Mużyło <galtgendo>
Component:	Current packages	Assignee:	Gentoo Ruby Team <ruby>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED
Severity:	normal
Priority:	Normal
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---

Description Rafał Mużyło 2023-02-27 12:43:51 UTC

While there had been no new release, given that upstream does test it with both 3.0 and 3.1, chances are things work properly.

A not very complex, yet non-trivial toy of mine using ruby-gtk4 (and ruby-gtksourceview5) seems to be working correctly (at least it starts and shows interactive gui - have yet to fully test it).

(well, red-colors is a bit spammy when run with 'ruby -w', but that's besides the point)

Comment 1 Rafał Mużyło 2023-02-27 14:05:47 UTC

(on that aside: while there hasn't been a release of red-colors in over two years, there had been commits in the repo that fix both the warnings and a couple 
 of bugs in the code - see commits 4b4e6eff136be38a27282979d139dec7f896e58c and 0575993210c8faee33e2dad972f3b4faf364e088; perhaps adding those two into the tree should be considered)

Comment 2 Larry the Git Cow gentoo-dev

2023-03-11 08:25:43 UTC

The bug has been closed via the following commit(s):

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=424104418e79b6891f05007c5a45dce3f6df6212

commit 424104418e79b6891f05007c5a45dce3f6df6212
Author:     Hans de Graaff <graaff@gentoo.org>
AuthorDate: 2023-03-11 08:24:17 +0000
Commit:     Hans de Graaff <graaff@gentoo.org>
CommitDate: 2023-03-11 08:25:39 +0000

    dev-ruby/rcairo: enable ruby30, ruby31
    
    Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/898150
    Signed-off-by: Hans de Graaff <graaff@gentoo.org>

 dev-ruby/rcairo/rcairo-1.17.8.ebuild | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comment 3 Rafał Mużyło 2023-03-11 12:24:41 UTC

...while red-colors was just a mention, I still consider it somewhat important - maybe not so much as the baseline or - you know - the stuff outside simple bumps in bug 874306, but given the upstream seems to have forgotten about it and that parts seem to be non-trivial (if likely mostly minor) bugs, it would be nice if that bit was addressed too...