| Summary: | sys-libs/fts-standalone: rename to sys-libs/musl-standalone and/or stop renaming .pc file? | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Sam James <sam> |
| Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Anthony Basile <blueness> |
| Status: | CONFIRMED --- | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | gentoo |
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
I'd call it musl-fts (as the repo is called upstream), and name the pc file the same as upstream. This is consistent with one example, void linux, where musl-fts-devel ships musl-fts.pc |
Right now, we have: ``` src_install() { default find "${ED}" -name '*.la' -delete || die mv "${ED}"/usr/$(get_libdir)/pkgconfig/{musl-fts,fts-standalone}.pc || die } ``` This looks a bit suspicious to me. My attention was recently drawn to https://github.com/theimpossibleastronaut/rmw/pull/385/files#diff-bcc0bb780c91d9a76bbcca08d6b03b54729ded44ea3cdf39b9cfda45c5d0f2feR1 and I suspect this wouldn't be able to detect our sys-libs/fts-standalone because we're renaming the .pc file...?