| Summary: | Dependency on kdebase is a bit too much | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Markus Tacker <m> |
| Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Gentoo KDE team <kde> |
| Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | ||
| Severity: | minor | CC: | betelgeuse |
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | x86 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
I wonder why you are not using split ebuilds for kdewebdev... Well, I am now. Probably there's a very low demand for using monolithic ancillary packages together with splitted core packages, so I think supporting it is not worthy. If there are no objections, we can close this bug... @#3: Agreed. I don't think adding || ( kdebase kdebase-meta ) is any maintenance overhead because the two should give identical installations? I agree that fine tuning the dependencies would be extra work at this point. I can even add these to 3.5.0 myself if you give me the permission. At least I found it useful to use the monolithic ebuilds when finding all the setuid programs. |
kdewebdev-3.4.0 depends on kdebase-3.4.0 Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: Expected Results: Drill it down to split ebuilds. I used DEPEND="~kde-base/kate-${PV} ~kde-base/konqueror-${PV} doc? ( app-doc/quanta-docs )"