Summary: | dev-libs/capstone: "next" patches required downstream | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | John Helmert III <ajak> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | mario.haustein |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | davidroman96, proxy-maint |
Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | PullRequest |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
See Also: |
https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/31469 https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/31499 |
||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
Ebuild for capstone commit 12e8258f60647a997ffa72702a9e5b37bd622044
Ebuild for capstone commit 61cdc56159986e6d77be571b04c570cf2c378d13 |
Description
John Helmert III
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=309640e8da12494bdc227e238bdbd7435cb415f9 commit 309640e8da12494bdc227e238bdbd7435cb415f9 Author: John Helmert III <ajak@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2023-01-23 03:38:19 +0000 Commit: John Helmert III <ajak@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2023-01-23 04:32:34 +0000 dev-util/radare2: add 5.8.2 Unbundle capstone to avoid upstream requirement of capstone-5 patches which are not shipped in Gentoo's capstone package. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/885395 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/889026 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/891805 Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/29223 Signed-off-by: John Helmert III <ajak@gentoo.org> dev-util/radare2/Manifest | 5 + .../files/radare2-5.8.2-bundled-capstone.patch | 21 ++++ .../radare2/files/radare2-5.8.2-vector35.patch | 24 ++++ dev-util/radare2/radare2-5.8.2.ebuild | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 175 insertions(+) Created attachment 854544 [details] Ebuild for capstone commit 12e8258f60647a997ffa72702a9e5b37bd622044 From https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/issues/21204 it seems radare2 only builds against specific commits of capstone. I extracted the commit 12e8258f60647a997ffa72702a9e5b37bd622044 from the build scripts and prepared the attached ebuild. @ajak: Can you confirm radare2 builds against this capstone version? If so I will publish it and you have to pinpoint it in the radare2 ebuilds. Created attachment 858015 [details]
Ebuild for capstone commit 61cdc56159986e6d77be571b04c570cf2c378d13
@ajak: Attached you will find a capstone ebuild suitable for radare 5.8.4 (Capstone commit 61cdc56159986e6d77be571b04c570cf2c378d13). Please check if it works and I will commit it to the tree.
Hi Mario, I apologize for the delay in responding. It does seem that radare-5.8.{2,6} are able to compile with your capstone-5.0_rc2-r4. But is this really what we want to do? There seem to breaking changes in the next branch, which other revdeps of capstone shouldn't be subject to? (In reply to John Helmert III from comment #4) > There seem to > breaking changes in the next branch, which other revdeps of capstone > shouldn't be subject to? AFAIK capstone isn't introducing breaking changes, but Radare2 just requires unreleased features from capstone. So using a newer version of capstone should be safe. I prepared a pull request adding the required capstone versions and added the required dependencies to Radare2. See: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/31469. Please review and tell if you agree with it. Capstone published a new release candidate today which is a suitable dependency for Radare2 (see https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/31499). The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=34ac96b281fbbf9c2d22133a3b32136e3884b24e commit 34ac96b281fbbf9c2d22133a3b32136e3884b24e Author: John Helmert III <ajak@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2023-06-18 18:58:37 +0000 Commit: John Helmert III <ajak@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2023-06-18 19:02:00 +0000 dev-util/radare2: use system capstone Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/891805 Signed-off-by: John Helmert III <ajak@gentoo.org> dev-util/radare2/radare2-5.8.8-r1.ebuild | 121 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 121 insertions(+) Thanks for handling this! Anything else needed before closing this bug, you think? Nothing to be done left |