| Summary: | www-apps/forgejo: package fork of www-apps/gitea? | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | gentoo |
| Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Default Assignee for New Packages <maintainer-wanted> |
| Status: | UNCONFIRMED --- | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | andrius, anrock623, casta, gentoo+bugs, hydrapolic, i, info, jdavid.ibp, me, tomas |
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Above text reformatted: Not long ago I read on the Internet about a program for hosting projects based on git called gitea. Wikipedia said about the split of the project and the creation of a commercial organization. Now the free fork that many developers have gone to is called Forgejo. Here is a link to the main page of the project https://forgejo.org/ Back in October, Gitea raised VC funds and went private, which is why Forgejo was initiated. It's community-driven with its first release in November. Codeberg is now using Forgejo's backend instead of Gitea's. It has been added to GURU https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/proj/guru.git/tree/www-apps/forgejo and maintained fairly up-to-date with upstream. |
> Not long ago I read on the Internet about a program for hosting projects based on git called gitea. Wikipedia said about the split of the project and the creation of a commercial organization. Now the free fork that many developers have gone to is called Forgejo. Here is a link to the main page of the project https://forgejo.org/ > Back in October, Gitea raised VC funds and went private, which is why Forgejo was initiated. It's community-driven with its first release in November. Codeberg is now using Forgejo's backend instead of Gitea's. Perhaps gentoo should switch www-apps/gitea to forgejo?