| Summary: | version bump to dotproject-2.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Urs Joss <tschenturs> |
| Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Web Application Packages Maintainers <web-apps> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | evert, frares, jgonzalez.openinput |
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| URL: | http://www.dotproject.net/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=102&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: | net-www/dotproject-2.0.1 | ||
|
Description
Urs Joss
2005-04-05 00:07:24 UTC
Created attachment 55332 [details]
net-www/dotproject-2.0.1
Please note:
The configuration is now handled through the web-browser. The seems to
distinguish between new installs and upgrades of former versions by looking at
the config.php file. If there exists a includes/config.php it assumes you're
upgrading an old version of dotproject.
The ebuild moves the config file includes/config-dist.php to
includes/config.php. So if you're installing dotproject as a fresh install,
manually move includes/config.php back to includes/config-dist.php.
Maybe it's possible to have webapp-config act accoringly: Have the ebuild not
move the file in /usr/share/webapps but have webapp-config do it in case of -U
but not -I. Can this be done?
in my case, the actual upgrade of my dotproject database (performed through the php-script triggered throught the browser) did not perfectly upgrade my database w/o manual intervention. Had some issues with the task view afterwards. I ended up dumping the upgraded mysql database to a file and diffed it against the dump of a fresh install. This helped me adjust the database. I'm quite sure this is nothing ebuild or gentoo specific. I have fiddled around with some CVS versions months ago. Therefore it might just as well not be an upstream issue either, but specific to my database. this isn't a dotnet herd package, silly seemant. where does it belong to? ;-) Comment on attachment 55332 [details]
net-www/dotproject-2.0.1
bumped to Version 2.0.1. Same (but renamed) ebuild as proposed for versions 2.0
bugfix release 2.0.1 Not sure what to do with this one if a dump/re-load of the data is required for an upgrade, it's a tad on the iffy side. Anyway, I'll try and get this into portage soon'ish for testing, though it will of course be package.mask'd. well I don't know if a dump is really necessary - does anybody else have some experience with the upgrade? Stu's the primary maintainer *** Bug 103244 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reassign to herd In CVS |
