Summary: | Mozilla 1.7.6-r1 won't compile | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Bruno Lustosa <bruno> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Mozilla Gentoo Team <mozilla> |
Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | ||
Severity: | critical | ||
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | AMD64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Bruno Lustosa
2005-03-25 17:28:14 UTC
Does it build if you use gcc+binutils that are marked stable on amd64? I'm emerging stable versions of both gcc and binutils now to give it a try. I'll post here after the downgrade. Aron, it compiled fine with stable versions of gcc and binutils. I guess this is a compiler bug, and should be sent to the gcc team? Aron, after I downgraded from gcc-3.4.3.20050110-r1 to gcc-3.4.3-r1, all compiles became extremely slow. I also had a few problems with libstdc++, which I had to correct by editing some files on /etc and /etc/env.d. By saying slow, I mean that when I run any configure script, it takes about 1 second for each test it makes. I'm running this on an Athlon64 3000+ with 1gig of ram, and I've never seen anything this slow. I'm trying to reupgrade gcc and deal with the packages that don't compile separately, but having a few troubles when upgrading gcc and binutils (compiler can't create executables, and so on). Do you know where I should look? Aron, solved the problem here. Had to mess with binutils binaries, as they weren't being found. Anyway, back to unstable gcc and binutils. Is there a way to send gcc/binutils bug reports? I'd like to continue testing unstable versions, and be helpful the way I can. As this has no longer nothing to do with mozilla, I'm closing this bug and marking as invalid. |