Summary: | sci-mathematics/glpk-5.0-r1 fails to compile (lto): minisat.c:139:8: error: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules [-Werror=strict-aliasing] | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Agostino Sarubbo <ago> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Robin Johnson <robbat2> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | frp.bissey, mjo, proxy-maint, sci-mathematics |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-glpk/2022-08/msg00000.html | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 618550 | ||
Attachments: |
build.log
0001-src-minisat-minisat.c-update-types-to-comply-with-al.patch |
Description
Agostino Sarubbo
![]() Created attachment 796894 [details]
build.log
build log and emerge --info
I just inspected the code in question and I am not sure if it should count as a false positive or not. I am guessing it may break some compiler optimizations. All the cases reported in minisat.c are `#define` statements, so I would count it as casting rather than aliasing. But it could cause problem when inlining. Created attachment 798121 [details, diff] 0001-src-minisat-minisat.c-update-types-to-comply-with-al.patch (In reply to François Bissey from comment #2) > I just inspected the code in question and I am not sure if it should count > as a false positive or not. I am guessing it may break some compiler > optimizations. All the cases reported in minisat.c are `#define` statements, > so I would count it as casting rather than aliasing. But it could cause > problem when inlining. I think the problem is that it's casting a pointer to one type (lit) to a pointer to another type (float), and then dereferencing. If so, that's undefined behavior in C even if it happens to work out correctly. I hacked the types to agree and it all worked on the first try, so that gives me some confidence even though I haven't tested it beyond "make check". Patch attached. Looks good to me. Reported it upstream... The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=dbda7d259111a90728d62fc56e6d664d5a745f0e commit dbda7d259111a90728d62fc56e6d664d5a745f0e Author: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz93@gmail.com> AuthorDate: 2024-03-05 01:37:21 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2024-03-05 04:47:50 +0000 sci-mathematics/glpk: mark as LTO-unsafe, strict-aliasing unsafe It has been reported upstream but no response. Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/863047 Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz93@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> sci-mathematics/glpk/glpk-5.0-r1.ebuild | 11 ++++++++++- sci-mathematics/glpk/glpk-5.0-r2.ebuild | 9 +++++++++ 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=e9cc5b98df6ccbfc116cd7340f1aa63e56a233cb commit e9cc5b98df6ccbfc116cd7340f1aa63e56a233cb Author: Michael Orlitzky <mjo@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2024-10-21 17:04:12 +0000 Commit: Michael Orlitzky <mjo@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2024-10-24 14:36:14 +0000 sci-mathematics/glpk: steal strict-aliasing patch from Fedora This lets us bring LTO back without having to be responsible for a custom patch. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/863047 Signed-off-by: Michael Orlitzky <mjo@gentoo.org> sci-mathematics/glpk/files/glpk-5.0-aliasing.patch | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++ .../{glpk-5.0-r2.ebuild => glpk-5.0-r3.ebuild} | 10 +-- 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) |