| Summary: | bochs 2.1.1 emake fails with no apparent errors | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Marius <inkredibl> |
| Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Luca Barbato <lu_zero> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | lionsphil |
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | AMD64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: | tail of failed emerge output | ||
|
Description
Marius
2005-03-18 09:10:44 UTC
Created attachment 53796 [details]
tail of failed emerge output
I downloaded bochs 2.2 source and tried to make it by hand. It complained something about libosp.so.4 not being found, so I traced to which package this belongs and tried to upgrade it and it worked! After that I tried to emerge bochs 2.1.1 and it worked too! the package is app-text/opensp, it is used for generating documentation as I understand. bochs needs =app-text/opensp-1.5.1 otherwise it won't emerge (dependency problem?). This doesn't seem to be true, at least for x86. I have a happily emerged Bochs 2.1.1 without opensp, openjade, et. al, and I'd rather not have this problem solved for some by saddling everyone else with even more dependancies. The relivant use flags are -debugger +gtk2 +readline +sdl -wxwindows. you're right, i have unmerged docbook and opensp stuff from my system and was able to build bochs manualy without any problems. in the configure script output i found these two lines: checking for docbook2html... not_found checking whether to build docbook documentation... no which means that if i don't have docbook it will not build documentation but it won't fail because of this, however if i do have docbook2html... only then i might be having more problems... I'll try to fix it in a cleaner way and maybe provide a ~ snapshot of the upcoming release Is still a problem? reopen if is. Can we at least drop the incorrect depedency on opensp? Bochs does NOT require this package to build. |