| Summary: | packages.gentoo.org shows all versions of app-editors/emacs as package masked | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Websites | Reporter: | Ulrich Müller <ulm> |
| Component: | Packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Packages Website <gpackages> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
| Severity: | major | CC: | gentoo, gnu-emacs |
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| URL: | https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/app-editors/emacs | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: |
Screenshot
p.g.o/packages/app-editors/emacs screenshot |
||
Looks like p.g.o doesn't properly process the slot part of the mask. After the following workaround it looks better: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=b498ccdbfcdab86afd3c50d20d5dc6d603611506 Created attachment 766160 [details]
p.g.o/packages/app-editors/emacs screenshot
This has either fixed itself, or was an unusual temporary issue. See attached screenshot
(In reply to Emily Rowlands from comment #2) > Created attachment 766160 [details] > p.g.o/packages/app-editors/emacs screenshot > > This has either fixed itself, or was an unusual temporary issue. See > attached screenshot Ulm said they made a masking change which is why its fixed now. The underlying bug is likely present. -A https://gitweb.gentoo.org/sites/soko.git/tree/pkg/portage/repository/mask.go is the code. It appears the result is that we ignore the slot and just mask all versions <28.0.1.9999. We should write a quick test case and then fix the bug. (In reply to Emily Rowlands from comment #2) > This has either fixed itself, or was an unusual temporary issue. See > attached screenshot Definitely not a temporary issue, but I've worked around the problem by updating the mask as mentioned in comment #1: -<app-editors/emacs-28.0.9999:28-vcs +=app-editors/emacs-28.0.90:28-vcs +=app-editors/emacs-28.0.91:28-vcs +=app-editors/emacs-28.0.92:28-vcs +=app-editors/emacs-28.0.93:28-vcs Which is somewhat awkward and may require updating for later pretest versions, so I'd really like to revert to the previous atom. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 832042 *** |
Created attachment 766159 [details] Screenshot See URL and attached screenshot. Obviously this is wrong. For reference, eshowkw outputs this: $ eshowkw Keywords for app-editors/emacs: | | u | | a a p s a r | n | | m r h p p l i i m m s | e u s | r | d a m p p c a x p a s 6 i 3 | a s l | e | 6 r 6 p p 6 r 8 h 6 c 8 p 9 | p e o | p | 4 m 4 a c 4 c 6 a 4 v k s 0 | i d t | o -----------------+-----------------------------+------------+------- [I]18.59-r14 | + o o o o o o + o o o o o o | 8 o 18 | gentoo -----------------+-----------------------------+------------+------- [I]23.4-r21 | + + o ~ + + ~ + ~ ~ o o ~ o | 8 o 23 | gentoo -----------------+-----------------------------+------------+------- [I]24.5-r11 | + + o ~ + ~ ~ + ~ ~ o o ~ o | 8 o 24 | gentoo -----------------+-----------------------------+------------+------- [I]25.3-r11 | + + + ~ + + + + ~ ~ o ~ ~ o | 8 o 25 | gentoo -----------------+-----------------------------+------------+------- [I]26.3-r6 | + + + ~ + + + + ~ ~ ~ o ~ o | 8 o 26 | gentoo -----------------+-----------------------------+------------+------- [I]27.2-r5 | + + + + + + + + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o | 8 o 27 | gentoo -----------------+-----------------------------+------------+------- [M]28.0.91 | ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o | 8 o 28-vcs | gentoo 28.0.9999-r1 | o o o o o o o o o o o o o o | 8 o | gentoo -----------------+-----------------------------+------------+------- [I]29.0.9999 | o o o o o o o o o o o o o o | 8 o 29-vcs | gentoo