Summary: | [ikelos] Ebuild failures occuring in global scope | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Michał Górny <mgorny> |
Component: | Overlays | Assignee: | Mike Auty (RETIRED) <ikelos> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | ahipp0, mike.auty, t |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/repos/ikelos.html | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 552950 |
Description
Michał Górny
2022-02-08 12:43:10 UTC
ping ping ping The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/data/api.git/commit/?id=c2bddddd38668330af74fae40f528fa4171bf1b1 commit c2bddddd38668330af74fae40f528fa4171bf1b1 Author: Thomas Bracht Laumann Jespersen <t@laumann.xyz> AuthorDate: 2022-05-23 12:36:10 +0000 Commit: Jakov Smolić <jsmolic@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2022-05-25 11:50:54 +0000 repositories.xml: remove 'ikelos' overlay CI failures since February 2022, pings have have gone unanswered. Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/832916 Signed-off-by: Thomas Bracht Laumann Jespersen <t@laumann.xyz> Signed-off-by: Jakov Smolić <jsmolic@gentoo.org> files/overlays/repositories.xml | 11 ----------- 1 file changed, 11 deletions(-) > pings have have gone unanswered. Well, I guess that's because of pings to no longer active @gentoo.org email address for Mike. Maybe ping him via his personal email address listed in https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=ikelos#c0 ? Thanks, as I just commented in my retirement bug I'm happy to have my repo delisted. I haven't noticed any issues in my github repo and now can't see the CI issue since the repository's been removed but I haven't seen portage raise any as an issue on my local machine? Happy to try and fix them if anyone remembers what issues they were though, and yep, I haven't been checking my gentoo email since I retired, thanks for the ping @ahipp0! @Andrey Thanks for following up on this, I was not aware that Mike wasn't receiving pings. @Mike We could just re-add the overlay and the QA report should spin up again. I went digging in the logs and found this: * net-analyzer/inetsim-1.2.5: failed sourcing ebuild: user: EAPI 5 not supported, (user.eclass, line 26: called die) which appears to have been the only issue afaict. Thanks, I've since resolved this (and bumped inetsim) although it's not well maintained since the work I do has changed and I don't have much need for it these days. If you think adding the overlay back in will be useful for people then I'm ok with that as long as I get emails about issues, but equally I don't mind if it's not listed. I'm much less experimental with ebuilds these days, so it's usually just for bumps when I'm impatient (which I don't commit to it). Let me know what you'd like to do, but either way this bug can hopefully be marked as resolved... 5:) (In reply to Mike Auty from comment #8) > If you think adding the overlay back in will be useful for people ... Just as a data point, I do use it (and that's why I noticed when it got removed), but I currently use it for a single package only. Also, adding a custom repository is now much easier with eselect-repository than it used to be with layman: eselect repository add ikelos git https://github.com/ikelos/gentoo-overlay.git eselect repository enable ikelos (In reply to Andrey from comment #9) > (In reply to Mike Auty from comment #8) > > If you think adding the overlay back in will be useful for people ... > > Just as a data point, > I do use it (and that's why I noticed when it got removed), > but I currently use it for a single package only. Sorry about that, currently I don't have a good insight into what overlays are being used, just the QA reports to go off of. > Also, adding a custom repository is now much easier with eselect-repository > than it used to be with layman: > eselect repository add ikelos git > https://github.com/ikelos/gentoo-overlay.git > eselect repository enable ikelos If that works for you, I suggest we just leave it at that? If others want the overlay back, I'm sure it's gonna find its way back to repositories.xml :-) then I'll try to remember to ping Mike on any QA reports. (In reply to Thomas Bracht Laumann Jespersen from comment #10) > ... > > If that works for you, I suggest we just leave it at that? If others want > the overlay back, I'm sure it's gonna find its way back to repositories.xml > :-) then I'll try to remember to ping Mike on any QA reports. Yeah, fair enough. |