Summary: | libgnome-2.8.1 failed to compile | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Milus János <jmilus> |
Component: | [OLD] GNOME | Assignee: | Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team <gnome> |
Status: | RESOLVED UPSTREAM | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | jean.brefort |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | AMD64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: | this patch fixes the problem for libgnome-2.8.1 compilation |
Description
Milus János
2005-02-24 01:19:14 UTC
Your report is actually missing the error, please post a few more lines up. Same error here, also on amd64. x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I./.. -pthread -DORBIT2=1 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/gnome-vfs-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/include -I/usr/include/bonobo-activation-2.0 -I/usr/include/libbonobo-2.0 -I/usr/include/gconf/2 -I/usr/include/orbit-2.0 -DG_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -DLIBGNOME_PREFIX=\"/usr\" -DLIBGNOME_LIBDIR=\"/usr/lib\" -DLIBGNOME_DATADIR=\"/usr/share\" -DLIBGNOME_BINDIR=\"/usr/bin\" -DLIBGNOME_LOCALSTATEDIR=\"/var/lib\" -DLIBGNOME_SYSCONFDIR=\"/etc\" -DVERSION=\"2.8.1\" -DGNOMEVFSVERSION=\"2.8.4\" -DG_LOG_DOMAIN=\"Gnome\" -g -O2 -pipe -MT gnome-program.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/gnome-program.Tpo -c gnome-program.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/gnome-program.o gnome-program.c: In function `gnome_program_init_paramv': gnome-program.c:1931: error: invalid initializer My feeling is that it is a gnome bug. See this change: http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/libgnome/libgnome/gnome-program.c?r1=1.72&r2=1.73 I make a bug report at bugzilla.gnome.org Hmm, it has already been reported. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=168110 Created attachment 52025 [details, diff]
this patch fixes the problem for libgnome-2.8.1 compilation
I've reverted the va_list initialisation to remain inline with Aron's previous patch. You'll need to sync, and then remerge -2.8.1. Do we always want to init va_list to an array, as in your patch? I guess we need more information, but this patch will fix things until then. Ideally we'll see how upstream comments on your page Jean. Resolving bug upstream, as it's being tracked (and should be fixed) up there. |