Bug 83136

Summary:	app-editors/emacs-cvs should be masked
Product:	Gentoo Linux	Reporter:	Horace Ip <salivian>
Component:	Current packages	Assignee:	Emacs project <emacs>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED
Severity:	major	CC:	parallelgrapefruit, qa
Priority:	High
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---

Description Horace Ip 2005-02-23 20:51:55 UTC

as subject.

emerging 21.3.50 -> 22.0.50 as I think 22 becomes the main stream in CVS now.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Comment 1 Mamoru KOMACHI (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2005-02-24 19:24:02 UTC

emacs-21.3.50.ebuild has "x86 ppc sparc ~amd64" keywords,
so emacs-22.0.50.ebuild should be marked stable on x86, ppc, and sparc
before removing emacs-21.3.50.ebuild. 

ppc and sparc team: please mark emacs-22.0.50.ebuild stable on your arch.

Comment 2 Jason Wever (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2005-02-26 19:29:03 UTC

Sparctastic

Comment 3 Joe Jezak (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2005-03-05 00:55:48 UTC

Marked ppc stable.

Comment 4 Mamoru KOMACHI (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2005-03-05 06:22:23 UTC

Thanks. Removed emacs-cvs-21.3.50.ebuild from CVS.

Comment 5 Mark Loeser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2006-01-10 18:12:33 UTC

Why is this ebuild stable?  Its a CVS ebuild, therefore, can't be considered "stable".  We should throw this back to atleast ~arch for everyone, if not KEYWORDS="-*".

Comment 6 Dan 2006-01-11 04:44:16 UTC

Based on some reasearch, it has to do with bug 22225, which is now fixed.

 http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-editors/emacs-cvs/emacs-cvs-21.3.50.ebuild?hideattic=0&rev=1.28&view=log

Comment 7 Mark Loeser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2006-02-24 21:44:06 UTC

emacs-cvs-22.0.50 is stable on a few archs.  As far as I can tell this is a live CVS ebuild.  Why are any of these unmasked?

Comment 8 Matthew Kennedy (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2006-02-25 10:53:35 UTC

Did you fail to read the hint posted in Comment #6?

Comment 9 Ciaran McCreesh 2006-02-25 10:59:03 UTC

That hasn't been an issue for a very long time.

Comment 10 Mark Loeser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2006-02-25 12:31:39 UTC

(In reply to comment #8)
> Did you fail to read the hint posted in Comment #6?
> 

I don't see how comment #6 is related.  There are live CVS ebuilds in the tree that are not package.masked.  If I'm wrong, someone please correct me.

Comment 11 Matthew Kennedy (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2006-02-25 14:57:53 UTC

I removed the ebuild containing stable keywords.

app-editors/emacs-cvs won't be package.masked however.