| Summary: | lxde-base/lxappearance-0.6.3-r2 stabilization request | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Matthew Smith <matthew> |
| Component: | Stabilization | Assignee: | No maintainer - Look at https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proxy_Maintainers if you want to take care of it <maintainer-needed> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | asturm |
| Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | CC-ARCHES |
| Version: | unspecified | Flags: | nattka:
sanity-check+
|
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| See Also: |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=883573 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=769524 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=889084 |
||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: |
lxde-base/lxappearance-0.6.3-r2 amd64
|
Runtime testing required: | No |
|
Description
Matthew Smith
2022-01-15 15:40:14 UTC
amd64 done all arches done Matthew, are we really stabilising maintainer-needed packages again? Please consider adding yourself as maintainer to LXDE then. > are we really stabilising maintainer-needed packages again? This isn't something I do often. From a search, it looks like I've only ever filed a stablereq for two other m-n packages and they were both for EAPI-6 cleanup. https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?component=Stabilization&email1=maintainer-needed%40gentoo.org&email2=matthew%40gentoo.org&emailassigned_to1=1&emailreporter2=1&emailtype1=equals&emailtype2=equals To be honest, I don't remember why I wanted to stabilise this package but I can assure you that I did not just roll a dice to pick a package with the aim of wasting the AT's time... But yes, I see the issue with having zombie packages like this so I'll either refrain from poking at them or will adopt them in the future :) (In reply to Matthew Smith from comment #3) > To be honest, I don't remember why I wanted to stabilise this package but I > can assure you that I did not just roll a dice I'm sure, but could it just have been made by mistake? (In reply to Matthew Smith from comment #3) > But yes, I see the issue with having zombie packages like this so I'll > either refrain from poking at them or will adopt them in the future :) That is exactly the state these (lxde-base/*) packages are in. They only remain in tree because for some reason I bothered to fix, bump and switch them to GTK3, see bug 769524, even if I don't use them myself (and for that reason did not make myself maintainer), dropping them back to ~arch in order to make no false promise. |
