Summary: | New courier-imap package breaks compatibility with auth_vmailmgr | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Grishnav <grishnav> |
Component: | [OLD] Server | Assignee: | Alin Năstac (RETIRED) <mrness> |
Status: | RESOLVED CANTFIX | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | net-mail+disabled |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Grishnav
2005-02-20 21:28:57 UTC
*** Bug 82761 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** taking over of vmailmgr bugs, being primary maintainer 'n stuff Cool. Hopefully something will happen with this ticket. :) Just to restate the problem (since reading over, I made a few typo's which makes the situation unclear): The vmailmgr package provides a program called authvmailmgr which can be used to authenticate against vmailmgr virtual users/domains in roughly the same way the authpam or authdaemon programs that accompany courier-imap work. That's fine for courier 3.x, but 4.x uses a new system for plugging in authentication modules. Vmailmgr is, as far as I know, unmaintained and without a new auth module. It's a bit of a shame, since I like the way vmailmgr works better than alternatives like vpopmail, but such is life. Hopefully, either: a) the gentoo team can continue to support vmailmgr, upgraind it's authentication modules, or b) vmailmgr can block courier >3.x and courier 3.x can be supported for a while to give anyone using vmailmgr time to migrate to another solution. I will try to fix this in the upcoming -r3 I'm sorry but is way too much work. I suggest to either: a) change imap server. (suggestion: bincimap) b) migrate to vpopmail (not something you could do easily; also, a bit hazardous from security point of view) I've switched to bincimap which is really awesome because use the exact authentication as qmail-pop3d (I use a customized checkpassword so you can guess why I'm so excited about it). It seems to be faster than courier but it has one minor step back: it doesn't support shared folders. Anyway, if you find a better solution than mine, just let me know. |