Summary: | www-apps/gitea-1.15.6 fails to compile: bindata.go:2024: syntax error: unexpected EOF, expecting comma or ) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Agostino Sarubbo <ago> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Ryan Tsien <i> |
Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | dlan, hydrapolic, juippis, proxy-maint, tea+gentoo |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
See Also: | https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=863956 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 841761 | ||
Attachments: |
build.log
gitea-1.15.6:20211130-123331.log |
Description
Agostino Sarubbo
![]() CC'ing also the author of the commit (db88b1580e3c7c19afc9b0045d860665736d30a0) Created attachment 741120 [details]
build.log
build log and emerge --info
Possible context of error(s): modules/public/bindata.go:2024: syntax error: unexpected EOF, expecting comma or ) ci has reproduced this issue with version 1.15.6 - Updating summary. Created attachment 757075 [details]
gitea-1.15.6:20211130-123331.log
updated log
Anyone else hitting this? I can't reproduce and there are no upstream issues open either. Is the tinderbox broken somehow? (In reply to Joonas Niilola from comment #6) > Anyone else hitting this? I can't reproduce and there are no upstream issues > open either. > > Is the tinderbox broken somehow? I got this error on some machine some time ago, but cannot reproduce it on my testing box either. *** Bug 841815 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 912394 *** (In reply to Ryan Qian from comment #9) > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 912394 *** usually the new is a duplicate of the existing and not vice-versa (In reply to Agostino Sarubbo from comment #10) > usually the new is a duplicate of the existing and not vice-versa Thanks for the correction, I will pay attention to it later. What I thought about this one was that the gitea version of this bug is too old and I can't reproduce it even after trying it, and subsequent analysis will be more difficult due to the obsolete libraries and golang version, so I want to keep the newer bug open. *** Bug 863956 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |