Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!

Bug 812971

Summary: app-text/coolreader-3.2.59-r1 lost patch coolreader-wxwidgets.patch
Product: Gentoo Linux Reporter: Ulenrich <ulenrich>
Component: Current packagesAssignee: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers <bug-wranglers>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE    
Severity: normal CC: Adrian.Bassett
Priority: Normal    
Version: unspecified   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Description Ulenrich 2021-09-13 17:51:33 UTC
the wxwidget patch seemingly got lost from the git repo despite the ebuild wants that patch to apply
Comment 1 Ulenrich 2021-09-13 18:05:50 UTC
if deleting the patch line in the ebuild and emerging without USE wxwidgets the ebuild emerges correctly.
Comment 2 Adrian Bassett 2021-09-13 19:04:05 UTC
(In reply to Ulenrich from comment #1)
> if deleting the patch line in the ebuild and emerging without USE wxwidgets
> the ebuild emerges correctly.

But see https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=812953
Comment 3 Ulenrich 2021-09-13 20:34:39 UTC
Yes, this is the same bug.
I didn't see, because it is not - as said in title - a compile issue but patch

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 812953 ***
Comment 4 Adrian Bassett 2021-09-13 20:48:42 UTC
(In reply to Adrian Bassett from comment #2)
> (In reply to Ulenrich from comment #1)
> > if deleting the patch line in the ebuild and emerging without USE wxwidgets
> > the ebuild emerges correctly.
> 
> But see https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=812953

Actually the bug I meant to point to was https://bugs.gentoo.org/811342 but never mind.
Comment 5 Ulenrich 2021-09-13 23:30:01 UTC
(In reply to Adrian Bassett from comment #4)
> (In reply to Adrian Bassett from comment #2)
> > (In reply to Ulenrich from comment #1)
> > > if deleting the patch line in the ebuild and emerging without USE wxwidgets
> > > the ebuild emerges correctly.
> > 
> > But see https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=812953
> 
> Actually the bug I meant to point to was https://bugs.gentoo.org/811342 but
> never mind.

You randomly point me to a bug number out of 800t which exactly is the duplicate? Oh boy, you have a magic feeling for bugs :)