Summary: | Replace historical.git with newer copy | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Infrastructure | Reporter: | Alec Warner <antarus> |
Component: | Git | Assignee: | Gentoo Infrastructure <infra-bugs> |
Status: | IN_PROGRESS --- | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | flow, mgorny, rich0, ulm |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 761876 |
Description
Alec Warner (RETIRED)
2021-08-04 18:28:53 UTC
Rich0, ulm@ asked that you weigh in on this. -A A copy of the repo is on Github: https://github.com/ulm/gentoo-x86-historical IMHO we should keep both conversions under repo/gentoo/. Not sure what names are best, maybe historical-1 and historical-2? Replacing historical.git by the new repo may be confusing, especially if people have this location as a git-remote and try to pull from it. historical-ulm ;-) I have pushed the new repo to archive/repo/gentoo-2.git. Should repo/gentoo/historical.git be moved to archive/repo/gentoo-1.git now? (In reply to Ulrich Müller from comment #5) > Should repo/gentoo/historical.git be moved to archive/repo/gentoo-1.git now? Ping. Can we do this please? People get confused about which one is the newer one. (In reply to Ulrich Müller from comment #6) > (In reply to Ulrich Müller from comment #5) > > Should repo/gentoo/historical.git be moved to archive/repo/gentoo-1.git now? > > Ping. Can we do this please? People get confused about which one is the > newer one. To clarify, I can rename /repo/gentoo/historical.git to /archive/repo/gentoo-1.git but then...should there be a repo at 'historical.git'? Or is the goal to just have 2 archive repos? -A I'd say just rename it. If it's easy to do, gentoo/historical.git could redirect to archive/repo/gentoo-1.git, but IMHO that's in the "nice to have" category. Ping. Could the last missing step be done please, namely renaming of repo/gentoo/historical.git to archive/repo/gentoo-1.git? The current layout is confusing. |