| Summary: | x11-terms/kitty minor ebuild modification | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Arnaud Vallette d'Osia <arnaudv6> |
| Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Mike Pagano <mpagano> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | arnaudv6, ionen, mpagano, proxy-maint |
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: |
emerge --info
Portage test python script |
||
|
Description
Arnaud Vallette d'Osia
2021-06-05 13:41:23 UTC
While it's true they're unneeded, it's still valid syntax and this should instead be fixed in portpeek if it's really the issue (haven't tried). At most quotes could be cleaned as part of other changes, but well. > this should instead be fixed in portpeek
agreed.
I see you've attached the right persons, thanks.
(In reply to Arnaud Vallette d'Osia from comment #2) > > this should instead be fixed in portpeek > > agreed. > > I see you've attached the right persons, thanks. Can you explain to me which quotes you mean ? and what you have in your package.accept_keywords? > Can you explain to me which quotes you mean ? Sure. those: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/tree/x11-terms/kitty/kitty-0.20.3.ebuild#n10 > and what you have in your package.accept_keywords? yep, here: =x11-terms/kitty-0.20.3 ~amd64 =x11-terms/kitty-terminfo-0.20.3 ~amd64 Thanks for portpeek by the way: I sometimes painfully checked things manually before, and I'm glad to rely on your tool. Arnaud, can you help me replicate?
/etc/portage/package.accept_keywords:
=x11-terms/kitty-0.20.3 ~amd64
=x11-terms/kitty-terminfo-0.20.3 ~amd64
installed:
eix kitty
[I] x11-terms/kitty
Available versions: ~0.19.3 ~0.20.1 (~)0.20.3 **9999*l {debug wayland PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="(+)python3_8 python3_9"}
Installed versions: 0.20.3(01:36:22 PM 06/07/2021)(-debug -wayland PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python3_9 -python3_8")
Homepage: https://github.com/kovidgoyal/kitty
Description: A modern, hackable, featureful, OpenGL-based terminal emulator
[I] x11-terms/kitty-terminfo
Available versions: ~0.19.3^t ~0.20.1^t (~)0.20.3^t **9999*l^t {debug}
Installed versions: 0.20.3^t(01:36:01 PM 06/07/2021)(-debug)
Homepage: https://github.com/kovidgoyal/kitty
Description: Terminfo for kitty, an OpenGL-based terminal emulator
portpeek -artq
package.keywords:
Could not find file /etc/portage/package.keywords
No ebuild options found.
package.accept_keywords:
package.unmask:
package.mask:
package.use:
package.env:
Done
> Arnaud, can you help me replicate?
Sure, thanks for the support, hope this helps:
emerge -avp kitty
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild R ~] x11-terms/kitty-0.20.3::gentoo USE="wayland -debug" PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python3_9 -python3_8" 3 406 KiB
Total: 1 package (1 reinstall), Size of downloads: 3 406 KiB
portpeek -a
package.keywords:
Could not find file /etc/portage/package.keywords
No ebuild options found.
package.accept_keywords:
Installed: <media-video/mpv-9999 Keywords ['amd64']
Installed: =app-misc/ddcutil-0.9.9 Keywords ['~amd64']
Installed: =x11-misc/piedock-1.6.9 Keywords ['~amd64']
Package: =x11-terms/kitty-0.20.3 ~amd64 not found. Please check /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords to validate entry
Installed: =x11-terms/kitty-terminfo-0.20.3 Keywords ['~amd64']
Installed: =xfce-base/thunar-4.17.3 Keywords ['~amd64']
Installed: =gui-apps/waybar-0.9.7 Keywords ['~amd64']
Installed: =dev-libs/date-3.0.0 Keywords ['~amd64']
Installed: =gui-wm/wayfire-0.7.1 Keywords ['~amd64']
Installed: =gui-libs/wf-config-0.7.1 Keywords ['~amd64']
Installed: =gui-apps/wcm-0.7.0 Keywords ['~amd64']
package.unmask:
package.mask:
package.use:
package.env:
Can you paste the output of emerge --info ? Which python version is active? Created attachment 714645 [details]
emerge --info
python 3.9
Created attachment 714657 [details]
Portage test python script
Firstly, thanks for you patience.
Can you run the attached script and print the output?
you're welcome, and thanks for the support ./test Package: =x11-term/kitty-0.20.3 exists The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=308e8a5cc6d7885e07ba16d9884ae63ca7366c2b commit 308e8a5cc6d7885e07ba16d9884ae63ca7366c2b Author: Mike Pagano <mpagano@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2021-06-11 18:57:44 +0000 Commit: Mike Pagano <mpagano@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-06-11 18:57:44 +0000 app-portage/portpeek: Fix split command Reported-by: Arnaud Vallette d'Osia Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/794439 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.18, Repoman-3.0.2 Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano <mpagano@gentoo.org> app-portage/portpeek/Manifest | 1 + app-portage/portpeek/portpeek-3.2.1.ebuild | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+) Yeah, that split() special behavior is a real foot-gun. Thanks for tracking this down. This indeed fixes this bug. (In reply to Arnaud Vallette d'Osia from comment #12) > Yeah, that split() special behavior is a real foot-gun. > Thanks for tracking this down. > This indeed fixes this bug. Thanks for your quick responses. You made me look up foot-gun. :) |
