Summary: | sys-devel/llvm-roc-4.0.0-r2 benchmark_register.h:17:30: error: ‘numeric_limits’ is not a member of ‘std’ | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Alessandro Barbieri <lssndrbarbieri> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Craig Andrews <candrews> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | gentoo, ionen, ostroffjh, sam |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
See Also: | https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787569 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 732706 | ||
Attachments: |
emerge_info
llvm-roc-4.0.0-r2:20210517-075840.log.xz |
Description
Alessandro Barbieri
2021-05-17 08:53:58 UTC
Created attachment 709362 [details]
emerge_info
emerge --info
Created attachment 709365 [details]
llvm-roc-4.0.0-r2:20210517-075840.log.xz
build log (compressed because it exceeds attachment limit, use 'xzless' to read it)
ping (In reply to Sam James from comment #3) > ping PRs welcome... I'm not experiencing this issue nor do I know how to fix it. :-/ From distant memory, I thin it just takes a one line addition to the .h file, but I'll have to dig into some older bugs to find the specifics. It looks like you just need to add +#include <limits> to the complaining .h file. (the + is because I pulled the line from a patch file for a different package with the same issue.) (In reply to Jack from comment #6) > It looks like you just need to add > > +#include <limits> > > to the complaining .h file. (the + is because I pulled the line from a > patch file for a different package with the same issue.) Could I trouble you to please submit a pull request? I kind of thought I was being dense. You already have files/llvm-roc-4.1.0-fix-missing-include.patch, so it looks like it's already been fixed. That patch is applied in 4.1.0 and 4.1.1, and I'm guessing it's fixed upstream in 4.2.0 (which is what I have installed) which doesn't apply that patch. (In reply to Craig Andrews from comment #4) > (In reply to Sam James from comment #3) > > ping > > PRs welcome... I'm not experiencing this issue nor do I know how to fix it. > :-/ Sure, no problem at all! But it looks like everything is good now. (Are you using GCC 11 btw?) |