Summary: | libgd.so points to wrong location | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Andrei Ivanov <andrei.ivanov> |
Component: | [OLD] Development | Assignee: | Gentoo Linux bug wranglers <bug-wranglers> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | gentoo-bug, vitaly_kushneriuk |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | 1.2 | ||
Hardware: | x86 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Andrei Ivanov
2002-09-11 11:43:25 UTC
this should be added before preplib /usr in the libgd 2.0.1 ebuild: rm ${D}/usr/lib/libgd.so.2 rm ${D}/usr/lib/libgd.so this after preplib /usr: dosym libgd.so.2.0.0 /usr/lib/libgd.so.2 dosym libgd.so.2.0.0 /usr/lib/libgd.so the patch is imo unnecessary, it applies correctly when the patch line is corrected (should be -p1) but its not used by the ebuild and produces the error that config.status is missing because configure wasn't executed I can handle that broken link, but is that patch necessary or not ? If yes, maybe that ebuild should be fixed so libgd could be compiled with the patch applied... libgd-2 is removed from the portage tree anyway, it was too problematic. *** Bug 7961 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |