Summary: | dev-util/umockdev-0.12.1 - /.../libumockdev-preload.c: error: no previous prototype for _xstat [-Werror=missing-prototypes] | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Toralf Förster <toralf> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team <gnome> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | dennis.lissov, juippis, kajanos, marduk, matthew, sam, skobkin-ru |
Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | PATCH |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 768369 | ||
Attachments: |
emerge-info.txt
dev-util:umockdev-0.12.1:20210305-065707.log emerge-history.txt environment etc.portage.tar.bz2 logs.tar.bz2 temp.tar.bz2 fix _xstat |
Description
Toralf Förster
2021-03-05 08:23:00 UTC
Created attachment 689418 [details]
emerge-info.txt
Created attachment 689421 [details]
dev-util:umockdev-0.12.1:20210305-065707.log
Created attachment 689424 [details]
emerge-history.txt
Created attachment 689427 [details]
environment
Created attachment 689430 [details]
etc.portage.tar.bz2
Created attachment 689433 [details]
logs.tar.bz2
Created attachment 689436 [details]
temp.tar.bz2
Any update ? see patch attached from upstream git/bug put it in /etc/portage/patches/dev-util/umockdev-0.12.1 Created attachment 698172 [details, diff]
fix _xstat
(In reply to Pavol Cvengros from comment #10) > Created attachment 698172 [details, diff] [details, diff] > fix _xstat Thx, it looks fine to me. (In reply to Michal Jakubowski from comment #8) > Any update ? If there were updates, we would have posted them here. Please do not do this. (In reply to Matt Turner from comment #12) > (In reply to Michal Jakubowski from comment #8) > > Any update ? > > If there were updates, we would have posted them here. Please do not do this. the bug lay for a month without updating so someone might have thought it was out of date. (In reply to Michal Jakubowski from comment #13) > (In reply to Matt Turner from comment #12) > > (In reply to Michal Jakubowski from comment #8) > > > Any update ? > > > > If there were updates, we would have posted them here. Please do not do this. > > the bug lay for a month without updating so someone might have thought it > was out of date. There are thousands of bugs that haven't been updated in more than a month. Take a look at the right column of https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/ *** Bug 784167 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Upstream patch referenced above and attached to this ticket resolved the issue for me (with sys-libs/glibc-2.33:2.2 on ~amd64). The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=74b3fb71af8fd929503cd51c76b9d51ba361776f commit 74b3fb71af8fd929503cd51c76b9d51ba361776f Author: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2021-07-27 00:48:47 +0000 Commit: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-07-27 00:49:51 +0000 dev-util/umockdev: Apply patch to fix glibc-2.33 compatibility Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/774267 Signed-off-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org> ...lare-__xstat-prototypes-for-glibc-2.32.90.patch | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++ dev-util/umockdev/umockdev-0.12.1.ebuild | 4 +++ 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+) So this bug was kind of a mess. No one experiencing it thought to mention that it was related to glibc-2.33. And, while it's great to attach a patch that fixes it, package maintainers are typically not in a position to judge the quality of the fix, so we like to see the patch in an upstream repo. A link to https://github.com/martinpitt/umockdev/commit/f1b416400479d861deffb4c5a40422dcdf190e85 would have been a lot better. |