Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!

Bug 768678

Summary: sys-process/psmisc-23.3-r1 - src/fuser.c: In function 'parse_inet': src/fuser.c:639:9: error: 'in6addr_any' undeclared (on uclibc-ng)
Product: Gentoo Linux Reporter: ernsteiswuerfel <erhard_f>
Component: Current packagesAssignee: Gentoo's Team for Core System packages <base-system>
Status: RESOLVED INVALID    
Severity: normal CC: ionen, jstein
Priority: Normal    
Version: unspecified   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---
Bug Depends on:    
Bug Blocks: 570544    
Attachments: build.log
emerge --info

Description ernsteiswuerfel archtester 2021-02-04 19:36:09 UTC
[...]
i686-unknown-linux-uclibc-gcc  -Os -march=pentium4 -pipe  -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -o src/pstree src/pstree.o -ltinfo  
i686-unknown-linux-uclibc-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -Wall -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/share/locale\" -I./src -DI386         -Os -march=pentium4 -pipe -c -o src/fuser.o src/fuser.c
src/fuser.c: In function 'parse_inet':
src/fuser.c:639:9: error: 'in6addr_any' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'in_addr_t'?
  639 |         in6addr_any);
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~
      |         in_addr_t
src/fuser.c:639:9: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
src/fuser.c: In function 'find_net6_sockets':
src/fuser.c:817:43: error: 'in6addr_any' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'in_addr_t'?
  817 |        (memcmp(&(conn_tmp->rmt_address), &in6addr_any, 16)
      |                                           ^~~~~~~~~~~
      |                                           in_addr_t
make[2]: *** [Makefile:622: src/fuser.o] Error 1
Comment 1 ernsteiswuerfel archtester 2021-02-04 19:38:09 UTC
Created attachment 685761 [details]
build.log
Comment 2 ernsteiswuerfel archtester 2021-02-04 19:39:47 UTC
Created attachment 685764 [details]
emerge --info
Comment 3 Ionen Wolkens gentoo-dev 2021-02-04 20:29:29 UTC
I'm not sure how much worth there is to reporting to uclibc bugs considering interest in dropping support was recently raised.

https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/8b376050c51c7fa9a8a05246feb8c781

I'm not sure if there's anyone working on this at all.

Most of base-system tools bugs would be obvious if just tried it too.
Comment 4 ernsteiswuerfel archtester 2021-02-04 20:44:53 UTC
(In reply to Ionen Wolkens from comment #3)
> I'm not sure how much worth there is to reporting to uclibc bugs considering
> interest in dropping support was recently raised.
Ah mkay, didn't know that! If I would have I would not have filed the oter bugs... But if it gets dropped my bugs will be easily resolved. ;)
Comment 5 Mike Gilbert gentoo-dev 2021-02-07 18:24:03 UTC
You are building this package with ipv6 support, but your libc has ipv6 disabled.