| Summary: | sys-apps/dbus-broker: dropped ~ppc64 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Sam James <sam> |
| Component: | Keywording | Assignee: | Mike Gilbert <floppym> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | ppc64, solpeth |
| Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | CC-ARCHES |
| Version: | unspecified | Flags: | nattka:
sanity-check+
|
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: |
sys-apps/dbus-broker ~ppc64
|
Runtime testing required: | --- |
|
Description
Sam James
2020-12-13 07:11:07 UTC
I removed the ~ppc64 keyword for the version bump in thinking that that was the policy for keywords you don't test yourself. Apologies if I have that wrong. (In reply to Jack Todaro from comment #1) > I removed the ~ppc64 keyword for the version bump in thinking that that was > the policy for keywords you don't test yourself. Apologies if I have that > wrong. Live and learn! You drop it if you *have* to (e.g. new dependencies which are not keyworded there, crazy new asm got added upstream and you're worried it won't work, ...), but in that case, you gotta file a bug to get it reinstated. On regular bumps, leave the keywords intact but reset to ~ (not stable). See https://devmanual.gentoo.org/keywording/index.html, but don't worry, it's not a big deal and happens a lot. And now you know! :) The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=16bb3f6c454ad4b066af631dbfdabd7093e653f7 commit 16bb3f6c454ad4b066af631dbfdabd7093e653f7 Author: Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-12-13 13:10:28 +0000 Commit: Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-12-13 13:12:18 +0000 sys-apps/dbus-broker: restore ppc64 keyword Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/759742 Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org> sys-apps/dbus-broker/dbus-broker-25.ebuild | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (In reply to Sam James from comment #2) > (In reply to Jack Todaro from comment #1) > > I removed the ~ppc64 keyword for the version bump in thinking that that was > > the policy for keywords you don't test yourself. Apologies if I have that > > wrong. > > Live and learn! You drop it if you *have* to (e.g. new dependencies which > are not keyworded there, crazy new asm got added upstream and you're worried > it won't work, ...), but in that case, you gotta file a bug to get it > reinstated. > > On regular bumps, leave the keywords intact but reset to ~ (not stable). > > See https://devmanual.gentoo.org/keywording/index.html, but don't worry, > it's not a big deal and happens a lot. And now you know! :) Thanks Sam! A very helpful and informative reply. |