Bug 758464 – dev-lang/ruby-2.7.2: Gem did_you_mean bundled and in RDEPEND

• Product: Gentoo Linux
• Status: RESOLVED FIXED

[Description Horst Prote 2020-12-04 22:57:54 UTC]

Despite of https://rubyreferences.github.io/rubyref/stdlib/bundled.html not listing did_you_mean any more it is still bundled in ruby_2_7, see
https://github.com/ruby/ruby/tree/ruby_2_7/lib

By listing it under PDEPEND the gem is installed twice causing "already initialized constant" warnings when used.

Reproducible: Always

[Comment 1 Horst Prote 2020-12-04 23:19:52 UTC]

Think I wrote nonsense above, but I'm not an ruby expert.

As I understand it now did_you_mean is not bundled but included in /lib.
So the solution would be to remove it from the DEPENDS at all. Am I right?

[Comment 2 Horst Prote 2020-12-05 13:46:04 UTC]

So, now I learned did_you_mean was promoted to a default gem. See
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16363

[Comment 3 Boris 2021-02-04 17:51:48 UTC]

Bump!

I have a problem too:
/did_you_mean/version.rb:2: warning: already initialized constant DidYouMean::VERSION
/gems/did_you_mean-1.4.0/lib/did_you_mean/version.rb:2: warning: previous definition of VERSION was here
/did_you_mean/jaro_winkler.rb:63: warning: already initialized constant DidYouMean::JaroWinkler::WEIGHT
/gems/did_you_mean-1.4.0/lib/did_you_mean/jaro_winkler.rb:63: warning: previous definition of WEIGHT was here
/did_you_mean/jaro_winkler.rb:64: warning: already initialized constant DidYouMean::JaroWinkler::THRESHOLD
/gems/did_you_mean-1.4.0/lib/did_you_mean/jaro_winkler.rb:64: warning: previous definition of THRESHOLD was here
/did_you_mean/spell_checkers/name_error_checkers/variable_name_checker.rb:9: warning: already initialized constant DidYouMean::VariableNameChecker::NAMES_TO_EXCLUDE
/gems/did_you_mean-1.4.0/lib/did_you_mean/spell_checkers/name_error_checkers/variable_name_checker.rb:9: warning: previous definition of NAMES_TO_EXCLUDE was here
/did_you_mean/spell_checkers/name_error_checkers/variable_name_checker.rb:25: warning: already initialized constant DidYouMean::VariableNameChecker::RB_RESERVED_WORDS
/gems/did_you_mean-1.4.0/lib/did_you_mean/spell_checkers/name_error_checkers/variable_name_checker.rb:25: warning: previous definition of RB_RESERVED_WORDS was here
/did_you_mean/spell_checkers/name_error_checkers.rb:5: warning: already initialized constant DidYouMean::NameErrorCheckers
/gems/did_you_mean-1.4.0/lib/did_you_mean/spell_checkers/name_error_checkers.rb:5: warning: previous definition of NameErrorCheckers was here
/did_you_mean/spell_checkers/method_name_checker.rb:7: warning: already initialized constant DidYouMean::MethodNameChecker::NAMES_TO_EXCLUDE
/gems/did_you_mean-1.4.0/lib/did_you_mean/spell_checkers/method_name_checker.rb:7: warning: previous definition of NAMES_TO_EXCLUDE was here
/did_you_mean/spell_checkers/method_name_checker.rb:20: warning: already initialized constant DidYouMean::MethodNameChecker::RB_RESERVED_WORDS
/gems/did_you_mean-1.4.0/lib/did_you_mean/spell_checkers/method_name_checker.rb:20: warning: previous definition of RB_RESERVED_WORDS was here
/did_you_mean.rb:87: warning: already initialized constant DidYouMean::SPELL_CHECKERS
/gems/did_you_mean-1.4.0/lib/did_you_mean.rb:87: warning: previous definition of SPELL_CHECKERS was here

[Comment 4 Jenny Danzmayr 2021-03-12 15:13:22 UTC]

I have the same issue.


% equery b /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.7.0/gems/did_you_mean-1.5.0/lib/did_you_mean/version.rb  
 * Searching for /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.7.0/gems/did_you_mean-1.5.0/lib/did_you_mean/version.rb ... 
dev-ruby/did_you_mean-1.5.0 (/usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.7.0/gems/did_you_mean-1.5.0/lib/did_you_mean/version.rb)

% equery b /usr/lib64/ruby/2.7.0/did_you_mean/version.rb
 * Searching for /usr/lib64/ruby/2.7.0/did_you_mean/version.rb ... 
dev-lang/ruby-2.7.2 (/usr/lib64/ruby/2.7.0/did_you_mean/version.rb)

[Comment 5 Larry the Git Cow 2021-03-13 14:00:37 UTC]

The bug has been closed via the following commit(s):

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=2e225cca1aa95b8a5e54cbd855f17dbaf88940d9

commit 2e225cca1aa95b8a5e54cbd855f17dbaf88940d9
Author:     Hans de Graaff <[e-mail]>
AuthorDate: 2021-03-13 11:06:44 +0000
Commit:     Hans de Graaff <[e-mail]>
CommitDate: 2021-03-13 14:00:29 +0000

    dev-lang/ruby: properly remove default gems
    
    In Gentoo we always expect the default gems to be present as gems, and
    the default gems need to be removed to avoid duplicate definitions in
    code that does not explicitly require the gem. json and did_you_mean
    were not or only partially removed.
    
    Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/758464
    Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.13, Repoman-3.0.2
    Signed-off-by: Hans de Graaff <[e-mail]>

 dev-lang/ruby/ruby-2.6.6-r3.ebuild | 259 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 dev-lang/ruby/ruby-2.7.2-r1.ebuild | 263 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 dev-lang/ruby/ruby-3.0.0-r2.ebuild | 264 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 786 insertions(+)