Summary: | gnome-extra/gnome-commander: last revdep of gnome-base/gnome-vfs | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Michał Górny <mgorny> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Uwe Scholz <u.scholz83> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | gnome, proxy-maint |
Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | PullRequest, UPSTREAM |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-commander/-/issues/33 | ||
See Also: |
https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/24092 https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/25201 |
||
Whiteboard: | fixed in 1.14.2 | ||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | 839969 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Michał Górny
2020-10-24 09:44:32 UTC
I won't be able to remove the gnome-vfs dependency in the near future in upstream. From my point of view it would make sense to mask and remove gnome-commander from the portage tree. Feel free to go ahead and remove the package. I did not do that before and don't know what has to be done to do it. As a package maintainer I give my okay here to remove gnome-commander from the portage tree. :-( Are you aware of any close alternatives we could point our users to? So far I've found x11-misc/sunflower as something with two-pane design and still maintained. (In reply to Michał Górny from comment #3) > So far I've found x11-misc/sunflower as something with two-pane design and > still maintained. GURU also has app-misc/doublecmd-bin, which would come close to that. I can also say that x11-misc/sunflower comes closest to gnome-commander, compared to other graphical file managers. What I would miss without gnome-commander is a multi-rename tool (it's a part of gnome-commander) which can make use of file metadata (i.e. exif, mp3tags, etc). I am not aware of such a tool in portage. Does someone know a possible replacement? Sunflower can only handle audio metadata when renaming files. Have you looked how hard it'd be to make parts depending on gnome-vfs optional? Well, when I started trying to code away from it more than two years ago, I was not that good in programming and honestly I did not really found a good migration guide which helped me. But I realized that gnome-vfs is used quite heavily in the program - for me it would take several months to code away from it. Also other volunteers gave up after some attempts. I always had the plan in my mind to start the work again, but I did not find the time... https://developer.gnome.org/gio/stable/migrating.html - Migrating from GnomeVFS to GIO I know all the official migration guides, but they are very abstract and short. When I tried to do the actual work I was lost with them. :-| Gnome Commander 1.14.0, independent of gnome-vfs, will be released in roughly two weeks. Can this issue be closed when 1.14.0 gets into the portage tree or only after 1.12.3.1 gets removed? (In reply to Uwe Scholz from comment #10) > Gnome Commander 1.14.0, independent of gnome-vfs, will be released in > roughly two weeks. Can this issue be closed when 1.14.0 gets into the > portage tree or only after 1.12.3.1 gets removed? Once cleaned up The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=c71c5a9e2dd183f06c779843b5f66e8dc67e69f6 commit c71c5a9e2dd183f06c779843b5f66e8dc67e69f6 Author: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2022-02-05 21:13:21 +0000 Commit: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2022-02-05 21:32:04 +0000 gnome-extra/gnome-commander: Version bump to 1.14.0 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/751001 Signed-off-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org> gnome-extra/gnome-commander/Manifest | 1 + .../gnome-commander/gnome-commander-1.14.0.ebuild | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+) The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=474f180346df4435aa93316ad6e7fe8e8390f45a commit 474f180346df4435aa93316ad6e7fe8e8390f45a Author: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2022-02-05 21:35:51 +0000 Commit: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2022-02-05 21:36:06 +0000 Revert "gnome-extra/gnome-commander: Version bump to 1.14.0" This reverts commit c71c5a9e2dd183f06c779843b5f66e8dc67e69f6. There's a pull request open. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/751001 Signed-off-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org> gnome-extra/gnome-commander/Manifest | 1 - .../gnome-commander/gnome-commander-1.14.0.ebuild | 54 ---------------------- 2 files changed, 55 deletions(-) The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=eedc730a49b3865a3f7622ce1cf16670b96e8576 commit eedc730a49b3865a3f7622ce1cf16670b96e8576 Author: Uwe Scholz <u.scholz83@gmx.de> AuthorDate: 2022-02-05 20:22:23 +0000 Commit: Joonas Niilola <juippis@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2022-02-09 17:46:14 +0000 gnome-extra/gnome-commander: add version 1.14.0 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/751001 Signed-off-by: Uwe Scholz <u.scholz83@gmx.de> Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.28, Repoman-3.0.3 Signed-off-by: Joonas Niilola <juippis@gentoo.org> gnome-extra/gnome-commander/Manifest | 1 + .../gnome-commander/gnome-commander-1.14.0.ebuild | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+) The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=9fa632a54ba5ec658fe735eade7ca0289bbc49eb commit 9fa632a54ba5ec658fe735eade7ca0289bbc49eb Author: Uwe Scholz <u.scholz83@gmx.de> AuthorDate: 2022-04-25 19:27:22 +0000 Commit: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2022-04-26 20:51:43 +0000 gnome-extra/gnome-commander: Remove old Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/751001 Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/25201 Signed-off-by: Uwe Scholz <u.scholz83@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org> gnome-extra/gnome-commander/Manifest | 1 - .../gnome-commander-1.12.3.1.ebuild | 66 ---------------------- gnome-extra/gnome-commander/metadata.xml | 1 - 3 files changed, 68 deletions(-) |