Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!

Bug 73994

Summary: mail-filter/qmail-scanner - make call another qmail-queue replacement on env settings
Product: Gentoo Linux Reporter: Perolo Silantico <per.sil>
Component: Current packagesAssignee: Net-Mail Packages <net-mail+disabled>
Severity: normal CC: carter.smithhart, kensington
Priority: Normal    
Version: unspecified   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---
Attachments: qmail-scanner.QSCANQUEUE.patched-1.24-r1.tar.gz

Description Perolo Silantico 2004-12-10 04:19:59 UTC
Integrating domainKeys with qmail is only possible if qmail-queue is not called directly by qmail-scanner but by qmail-dk. See Bug 40486. So should read the queue program to call from environment variable QSCANNERQUEUE much like qmail-scanner itself is called by qmail-smtpd.

A patch and its integration in qmail-scanner-1.24-r1.ebuild is attached to next comment. It adds a small line to read the env variable QSCANNERQUEUE if available and if the specified binary is executable by the effective UID.
Comment 1 Perolo Silantico 2004-12-10 04:21:56 UTC
Created attachment 45675 [details]

a new ebuild package containing a patch to to evaluate
QSCANNERQUEUE environment variable. 

The additional patch file is:
Comment 2 Perolo Silantico 2004-12-11 16:17:32 UTC
Created attachment 45781 [details]

Sorry. Old patch does not work with perl-taint-mode. I have thought the error
calling the other program has nothing to do with perl-tainting but with
permissions on the app to call. 

The New version of the patch works properly with perl "-T" mode as used with
Comment 3 Carter Smithhart 2006-01-08 16:34:20 UTC
Just out of curiosity.. Do you think this should be an upstream fix instead of a gentoo fix?
Comment 4 Michael Palimaka (kensington) gentoo-dev 2013-06-23 14:20:03 UTC
(In reply to Carter Smithhart from comment #3)
> Just out of curiosity.. Do you think this should be an upstream fix instead
> of a gentoo fix?

Probably upstream. @qmail, any thoughts?
Comment 5 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2016-05-06 08:22:50 UTC
Please report this directly to upstream (if still valid with 2.08)